[meteorite-list] Rocks From Space Picture of the Day - October 15, 2006
From: Matt Morgan <mmorgan_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon Oct 16 12:27:38 2006 Message-ID: <4533B2F4.2090903_at_mhmeteorites.com> Ed: This excerpt was taken from http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc97/pdf/1342.PDF, "Esquel: Implications for Pallasite Formation Processes Based on the Petrography of a Large Slab" by Ulff-Moller, F. <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/author_form?author=Ulff-Moller,+F&fullauthor=Ulff-Moller,%20F.&charset=UTF-8&db_key=AST>; Tran, J. <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/author_form?author=Tran,+J&fullauthor=Tran,%20J.&charset=UTF-8&db_key=AST>; Choi, B.-G. <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/author_form?author=Choi,+B&fullauthor=Choi,%20B.-G.&charset=UTF-8&db_key=AST>; Haag, R. <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/author_form?author=Haag,+R&fullauthor=Haag,%20R.&charset=UTF-8&db_key=AST>; Rubin, A. E. <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/author_form?author=Rubin,+A&fullauthor=Rubin,%20A.%20E.&charset=UTF-8&db_key=AST>; Wasson, J. T., 1997 <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/author_form?author=Wasson,+J&fullauthor=Wasson,%20J.%20T.&charset=UTF-8&db_key=AST> It summarizes how the Esquel parent body may have formed, resulting in a beautiful meteorite when slabbed. Granted, this is not Krasnojarsk, but it probably formed in a similar way. "The largest slab available is that of Esquel (belonging to Haag); the slab is ~90?36 cm (surface area ~2900 cm2). Olivine is volumetrically the most abundant phase; angular grains range from submillimeter size to 2.5 cm. Approximately 25 vol.% of the olivine occurs in compact subrounded to subangular masses ranging from 3?7 cm to 10?17 cm. The large olivine masses are transected by thin veins of metallic Fe-Ni; these veins presumably formed by the high pressure injection of low-viscosity metal, probably during an impact event. The large olivine masses are probably fragments of much larger (>>1 m) blocks from the mantle. It seems likely that most of the small olivine fragments were also produced during the original crushing event, but we cannot rule out a role by subsequent events. There are relatively few olivine grains having sizes <1 mm and these tend to occur together in patches; these may record late events because the fine particles produced during the initial crushing event may have been consumed during (very limited) recrystallization. There is no clear-cut evidence of flow of the metallic liquid based on the orientations of the individual olivine grains." E.P. Grondine wrote: > Hi all - > > Sorry for a second post on this meteorite, but... > > This is a wonderful slicing job by someone. > > The contrasts in its components make this meteorite > remarkable. How did it form? There must have been > great temperature contrasts, and the materials are so > well separated. It would be nice to have microscopic > images of the boundaries. > > great meteorite, but unfortunately I'd rather have a > new used car... > > good hunting, > Ed > Man and Impact in the Americas > > --- SPACEROCKSINC_at_aol.com wrote: > > >> http://www.spacerocksinc.com/October_15.html >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >> >> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > -- =============== Matt Morgan Mile High Meteorites P.O. Box 151293 Lakewood, CO 80215 USA http://www.mhmeteorites.com ebay id: mhmeteoritesReceived on Mon 16 Oct 2006 12:27:32 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |