[meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun Oct 15 06:08:15 2006
Message-ID: <029201c6f041$d572d150$6501a8c0_at_HPDESKTOP>

Stan,

I addressed you and the List directly about the data on NWA 1836/3133 and
you were wrong. If you are too lazy to ask Dr. Bunch yourself, look in the
archives as this two year argument is over. NAU and Carnegie's data do not
support a pairing, look it up. I think you are borrowing Aaronson's numbers
in regards to the these new listings, I will ask Dr. Bunch tomorrow. There
is no need to argue with a source who has gotten wrong so many times.

Good Night,


Adam





- Original Message -----
From: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
To: <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days


>
>
>>
>>It is obvious you want it both ways. You base your Brachinite
>
> Brachnite? i thought we were talking about angrites. In any event i am not
> basing the potential pairing on anything i see - as i said i am just
> relaying information provided to me by my sources. researchers and
> moroccains alike
>
>>pairing visually yet your Acap looks identical to 12 kilograms of material
>>the Aaronson's were selling over the last year. You are in touch with Dr.
>>Bunch, ask him about NWA 1839/3133 as this has already been addressed on
>>the List in some detail and as usual you came out on the short side of the
>>stick.
>
> I did? from what i recall you claimed there was new data that argued
> against the 1839/3133 pairing.
>
> I also recall Jeff Grossman posting to the list saying something to the
> effect that based on the data avalible currently a claim of pairing wasnt
> unreasonable.
>
> you claim there is new data that argues against this - i have asked you to
> provide the data 4 times now in the last few hours and yet you dont offer
> anything to support your claim other than tales of this mysteryous 'new
> data'. I fail to see how i'm the one comming up short either then or now
> on this issue. I'm not the one going on about 'new data' that i cant
> produce.
>
>>Ask Dr. Bunch if your new Acap is paired to all of the other 12 kilograms
>>unless you are using another Aaronson number in which case he will not
>>report back to you.
>
> I'll be sure to ask next time I speak with Dr. Bunch. in the mean time if
> you look at
> http://www4.nau.edu/meteorite/Meteorite/PrimitiveAchondrite.html you will
> see the minerology of the paired stones all are virtually identical,
> whereas the data for nwa 2775 is nowhere near close.
>
>
>
Received on Sun 15 Oct 2006 06:08:16 AM PDT