[meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun Oct 15 04:32:19 2006
Message-ID: <023701c6f034$6e55a4f0$6501a8c0_at_HPDESKTOP>

Stan,

I would be happy to let this debate end here and now. All I ask is not to
mention my last name out of context in a public auction, we have discussed
this before. You have the right to run your auctions any way you want but if
I see unofficial pairing statements to material I am involved with, I will
take exception to it, sometimes publicly since our investment in time and
energy is great and I do not believe in free rides.

Adam

.


----- Original Message -----
From: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
To: <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days


>
>>Stan,
>>
>>Just admit you are telling fibs. You say that Aaronson and others say the
>>stones look the same. That's funny, Aaronson and Boswell have never seen
>>NWA 2999! You know what happened when Farrell changed the NWA 2999
>>abstract to match his sample. It is simple, get your facts straight!
>>
>>Adam
>
> Adam,
>
> If you say Greg did not get nwa 2999 from Adam Aaronson I will take your
> word and admit to being mistaken specifically regarding the origin of nwa
> 2999. Aaronson HAS seen nwa 3164 - a pairing to nwa 2999 per the metbull
> website - and would be happy to tell you it's the same stuff as my
> provisional nwa 2934. I dont know what Boswell has to say about this
> material as i dont know the guy, and have never made any claims to his
> opinion on the matter.
>
> are all clear now?
>
>
>
Received on Sun 15 Oct 2006 04:32:20 AM PDT