[meteorite-list] RE: Self-Proclaimed Pairing Issues
From: mark ford <markf_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon May 8 06:30:54 2006 Message-ID: <6CE3EEEFE92F4B4085B0E086B2941B315092D4_at_s-southern01.s-southern.com> Hi I think the real problem basically here is that fact that the classifying institutions are just unable to classify material quickly enough for the high turn over pace of the real life commercial world, the fact that it takes many months or even many years to classify even a simple Chondrite, is usually the reason that most people don't bother (I'm not saying that's morally right). But it needs to be way more accessible. I can't say I blame the institutions though either, to me it is bizarre that government funded institutions are tied up doing work for commercial companies/meteorite dealers, for often no more than a few grams of material!? As for not being able to trademark numbers I can only speak of my experience for the UK, but there CERTAINLY are numerous number trademarks (118118 is a classic example here in the UK) most are phone numbers for various services. Maybe then the US is different but it is not a problem for the UK at least. In fact looking into it, in theory one could trademark 'NWA869' for the whole of the UK and probably Europe for just a few hundred quid... Best, Mark Ford -----Original Message----- From: Meteoriteshow [mailto:meteoriteshow_at_free.fr] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:56 AM To: mark ford; meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] RE: Self-Proclaimed Pairing Issues Hi Mark and All, Your suggestion is again a purely commercial point of view. I do not say that it is a wrong way but should not be the only one to my opinion. I agree that with current infrastructures it is not possible to have any single rock analysed and classified, but is it really necessary? When not classified, meteorites can be proposed to collectors, simply mentioning that they are not classified. Many meteorites are sold this way, dealers selling still with profit -which of course is normal!- and collectors being able to add some nice pieces to their collection at attractive prices. Once again there are already some rules by the Nom Com, which to me are sufficient but not followed by everybody. That is the point. Getting meteorites classified takes time and when having an interesting one it is worth getting into that process -pairings for instance-. Our modern societies always push us to go faster & faster and those meteorites have been waiting on the ground for ages. Can't we at least wait for a few months when we want to have them classified? Best wishes, Frederic Beroud http://www.meteoriteshow.com IMCA member # 2491 (http://www.imca.cc/) ----- Original Message ----- From: "mark ford" <markf_at_ssl.gb.com> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 10:21 AM Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] RE: Self-Proclaimed Pairing Issues Hi, This pairing argument/debate is one that has been going for years and years, and will most probably continue way beyond all of us. To my way of thinking It will never be solved unless every single rock that is found is analysed by a competent body and given a serial numbered cert, that is clearly not going to happen unless someone opens a massive meteor lab complex and makes a commercial charge for classification, This would also require a complete overhaul of the classification process, and probably wouldn't be practical. So by way of a constructive suggestion, why don't dealers just trademark their classifications? It would work like this: Dealer gets the rock classified, a number or name gets issued by the Nom Com et al. Then the dealer registers it as a trademark, so anyone who sells the material under that name (or makes a claim that it is the same) would then be breaking the law, as they are trading under someone else's trademark simple. - A commercial trademark belongs to the person who registers it, not the person who names it. Just a thought... Mark Ford ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Mon 08 May 2006 06:33:11 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |