[meteorite-list] RE: Self-Proclaimed Pairing Issues

From: Norm Lehrman <nlehrman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon May 8 00:18:50 2006
Message-ID: <20060508041845.29475.qmail_at_web81009.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Thomas,

Take heart. "Almost a year"? Try never. The last
piece I sent to UCLA they claim to never have received
even though people visiting the lab asked about it and
were told probable preliminary classifications. Now
they want a second piece?

Can anyone help me get the "kick me" sticker off my
back?

I don't know where the problem might be. US mail?
UCLA mailroom? Met lab? I suspect the mail room.
"Packages going to this department might have valuable
rocks." But that doesn't explain the verbal
communications suggesting the material was in process.
 Lesson: if you can find a way, have your material
hand carried into the hands of a respected scientist
by someone who can vouch that it was delivered.

I am very disheartened by the whole experience.

Maybe you get what you pay for. It appears I did.

Cheers,
Norm
http://tektitesource.com

--- Thomas Webb <webbth1_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

> List Members,
> There are a few people who seemingly are able to get
> meteorites classified in a matter of weeks. I have
> been waiting for almost a year now and don't even
> have
> a number much less a classification. Is this due to
> the volume supplied by some and the consequent
> revenue
> to the institution or what is the reason for the
> inequity?
> I would appreciate some answers to the list on this
> matter.
> Thank you,
> Thomas H. Webb
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Mon 08 May 2006 12:18:45 AM PDT