[meteorite-list] Dawn Asteroid Mission Could Rise Again
From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Mar 17 13:26:37 2006 Message-ID: <200603171702.k2HH2LX08305_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov> http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn8861-dawn-asteroid-mission-could-rise-again.html Dawn asteroid mission could rise again Kimm Groshong New Scientist 17 March 2006 NASA has pried up what appeared to be the final nail in the coffin of its Dawn mission to visit the two largest main-belt asteroids, Ceres and Vesta. According to an official NASA statement, associate administrator Rex Geveden will be conducting a review of the decision to cancel the mission "in light of additional information provided by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory". Mary Cleave, associate administrator for NASA's science mission directorate axed the mission on 2 March, having reviewed the findings of an independent review board. NASA ordered the Dawn mission to "stand down" in October 2005 to allow the board to assess its progress, after technical problems and funding issues became apparent. NASA has never been critical of the mission's science objectives. When the mission was cancelled, Andrew Dantzler, director of NASA's planetary science division, said the review board had found 29 major issues that would have to be resolved before Dawn could proceed. He said the mission was behind schedule and estimated to come in about 20% over-budget. NASA is granting no interviews with Geveden until the new review is complete. The statement, dated 9 March, says: "The review is expected to conclude within the next two weeks." Planet forming Lucy McFadden, a co-investigator for the Dawn mission based at the University of Maryland in College Park, US, says she does not know what the new information from JPL is. "But the fact that NASA is willing to listen to our case is important," she told New Scientist. She emphasises the importance of the mission's timing to achieve its scientific goals. "The opportunity to visit, by spacecraft, both Vesta and Ceres is limited to launching within the next year," she says. "There is urgency to do this now for the sake of space science exploration in the next decade." A new mission to both asteroids would not be feasible again for 15 years, she says. Furthermore, she says, findings from Hubble and ground-based telescopes have made Ceres and Vesta more scientifically interesting in recent years: "They're not just fragments of rocks. They're bodies that were growing into planets and they have some characteristics of planets." Water ice It has long been known that Vesta has been heated in its history, but recent spectroscopic results suggest there may also be small amounts of water on the asteroid's surface. In the case of Ceres, which scientists had always believed to be uniform in composition, Hubble has found the asteroid may actually have a water ice mantle that expands, inflating its shape. "That changes our whole view of Ceres," she says. So, McFadden concludes, it is compelling to go both Ceres and Vesta not only because so little is known about the main asteroid belt, but also because "they are precursors to our planets" and they may contain clues about the formation of the solar system's inner planets. Received on Fri 17 Mar 2006 12:02:21 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |