[meteorite-list] Comments re: membrane boxes from Ron Hartman
From: Walter Branch <branchw_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun Feb 12 06:36:23 2006 Message-ID: <030001c62fc8$c1656450$6101a8c0_at_BranchFamily> Hi Ron, I know this was discussed a few years ago on the list but could you address which might better for meteorites in terms of curation. If I recall, there was some concern about the padding used in the non-membrane type boxes being potentially harmful to meteorites. Thanks -Walter Branch ________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "R. N. Hartman" <rhartman04_at_earthlink.net> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:10 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Comments re: membrane boxes from Ron Hartman > Reply from Ron > > I have enjoyed all the free advertising so far on this list, and have > found > all the posts of interest. I appreciate healthy debate and the many > points > that have been made. > > I would like to address two comments regarding one of the previously sent > posts. > > COMMENT 1)<<You can't tell me that stretching that membrane across the > plastic is so much more difficult than sticking a piece of round foam in a > jar > that it costs 3-4 times as much to make??? > > REPLY: In fact, it is. There is a great deal of hand assembly in this > process. The membrane is attached by a process almost identical to > putting > a new screen on a screen door and trimming it to size. The stretch has to > be just right for the box to have its shock proof characteristics and for > the membrane to return to a flat plane when the piece is removed. It > requires special tooling and semi-automated machinery, and a skilled > person > to do the job. We do this ourselves, and it required sending Jim to the > factory in Europe for a week of special training plus the purchase and > importing of the equipment. If we did not do part of the manufacturing, > we > could not keep our prices lower than everyone elses. > > COMMENT 2)<<... and am really annoyed by the > mold mark in the middle of it-- exactly where a mold mark should NOT be on > a > display case>> > > REPLY: The box is a patented invention, but was not designed with > meteorite > collectors in mind. It was designed for transportation and/or storage of > delicate parts and to provide shock protection. THE GOOD NEWS: Our #10 > membrane box, 100 x 50 x 16 mm is our own unique box with NO MOLD MARK OR > MARKINGS. We offer it with a colorless latch. It is the ideal size for > smal > pieces. We provide it with colorless latches. > > We got into the membrane business a few years ago after reading that a > number of collectors were looking for the product. There are other > dealers > on the web. You can find them by going to Google and typing membrane box > into the search. We tried them initially. One such dealer sent loose > boxes > in a zip-lock bag, so scratched up that half were unusable. Another (and > I > talked to their CEO personally) took about 3 months to deliver the micro > boxes and a third of the boxes were scuffed on one side due to improper > packing. Most of these places do not keep much of a stock in inventory, > as > we try to do. And, we guarantee that our boxes will arrive quickly and > fully assembled, in perfect condition and ready to use, or we will replace > them. You don't have to worry about broken plastic cases due to rough > handling in shipping. > > We also offer advise and support about the proper sized for your needs. I > notice that some other sellers on the web are now including in their ads > that the membrane boxes are good for meteorites, although I suspect that > most couldn't recognize a meteorite if they tripped on it! > > I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments. > RON > R. N. HARTMAN, Inc. > METEORITES AND ACCESSORIES > MEMBRANE SUSPENSION BOXES > Serving collectors, education and industry worldwide > > email: > info_at_meteorite1.com > info_at_membranebox.com > > visit us on the web at: > www.meteorite1.com > www.membranebox.com > > Mailing address: > R. N. Hartman > 20687-2 Amar Road #400 > Walnut, CA 91789 (U.S.A.) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:36 PM > Subject: Re: Re: [meteorite-list] Membrane Boxes > > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:15:53 -0500, you wrote: > >>I find Ron Hartman's pricing very reasonable. Try to beat that by buying >>from the source in Europe and having them shipped to the US. >> > > The prices are reasonable-- if you are displaying pieces worth a sizable > multiple of the price of the membrane box. For instance, a $800 lunar in > a > $2 > membrane box is no big deal. I tend to collect micromounts, both for > economic > and for space reasons. I thought about putting all of mine into membrane > boxes, > but I just could not justify paying the price per membrane box when you > could > get a gem jar of about the same size for a small fraction of the price. > The > gem > jars are about the same size, about the same amount of material, and about > the > same complexity to manufacture, but because only one company is making the > membrane boxes, there is no competition for them, and therefore inflated, > monopoly prices. You can't tell me that stretching that membrane across > the > plastic is so much more difficult than sticking a piece of round foam in a > jar > that it costs 3-4 times as much to make? I only go with a membrane box > for > the > pieces with great interest on both size. My other micro pieces go into > gem > jars. Also, I have one of the boxes like this one, and am really annoyed > by > the > mold mark in the middle of it-- exactly where a mold mark should NOT be on > a > display case: http://home.earthlink.net/~capricorn89/box23.jpg > (irrelevant > side > note-- I worked in a plastics plant running injection molding machines one > summer during school, some of the machines the size of rooms. It gives an > interesting perspecitive on how plastic objects are made). > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: 2/10/2006 > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: 2/10/2006 > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Sun 12 Feb 2006 06:37:47 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |