[meteorite-list] Study Confirms 2003 UB313 Indeed Larger than Pluto
From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Feb 1 15:31:28 2006
Study Confirms '10th Planet' Indeed Larger than Pluto
By Robert Roy Britt
01 February 2006
An object discovered earlier this year and considered by some to
be our solar system's 10th planet is indeed larger than Pluto, a
new study confirms.
The object, catalogued as 2003 UB313 is by many accounts a planet.
It is round and orbits the Sun.
But because several other objects meet those criteria and also approach
Pluto's size, astronomers have been wrangling for months
over how to define the word "planet." It is not known if or when the
International Astronomical Union, which rules on such things, will issue
a decision. Members of an advisory board weighing the issue can't even
agree on the parameters of a definition.
Meanwhile, 2003 UB313 is now known to be about 1,860 miles (3,000
kilometers) in diameter, give or take 190 miles (300 kilometers).
Pluto is 1,430 miles (2,300 kilometers) wide.
The object's size was initially calculated based on an estimate of how
much sunlight it reflects. But astronomers don't know exactly what its
surface is made of, so they could not be sure how reflective it is.
The new study, led by Frank Bertoldi from the University of Bonn, relies
on new observation of 2003 UB313's thermal emission. The calculations
are based on the object's size and its surface temperature, which can be
estimated based on the object's distance from the Sun.
The results are detailed in the Feb. 2 issue of the journal Nature.
"Since UB313 is decidedly larger than Pluto," Bertoldi said, "it is now
increasingly hard to justify calling Pluto a planet if UB313 is not also
given this status."
But 2003 UB313 is much farther away. Its elongated orbit takes it far
out into the icy Kuiper Belt, twice as far from the Sun as Pluto. Many
astronomers now say Pluto is a Kuiper Belt Object and should never have
been called a planet.
So if 2003 UB313 is termed a planet, as some suggest, then a handful of
other good-sized, round worlds known to exist - and perhaps hundreds yet
to be found in the Kuiper Belt - would also have to be called planets.
Among the other candidates: Sedna, which is about three-fourths as large
as Pluto, 2004 DW and Quaoar.
One suggestion is to call the outer worlds "dwarf planets."
Scott Sheppard of the Carnegie Institute of Washington takes this view:
"Whichever way you care to count them, with the discovery and
measurement of the size of 2003 UB313 there are no longer nine major
planets in the solar system," Sheppard writes in an analysis for Nature.
Sheppard also notes a surprise that's come from this study and others
Astronomers have now accurately measured the diameter and
reflectiveness, or albedo, of a handful of Kuiper Belt Objects.
"It seems that the largest objects have the highest albedos," Sheppard
said. "This could be because gravity on these objects is large enough
for them to have active atmospheres and so be able to retain volatile
gaseous substances that could brighten their surfaces."
Received on Wed 01 Feb 2006 02:28:06 PM PST