[meteorite-list] Terminological question: SMB vs. IMB
From: Greg Hupe <gmhupe_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Sep 2 09:28:03 2005 Message-ID: <072d01c5afc2$236f9a80$73105c18_at_Gregor> Hello Jeff and List, Thank you for the quick answers to Martin's questions. I personally think that both terms, "Impact Melt Breccia (IMB)" and "Shock Melt Breccia(SMB)" clearly describe these beautiful meteorites. The material is 'shocked' by an 'impact' event. Take care, Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Grossman" <jgrossman_at_usgs.gov> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Terminological question: SMB vs. IMB > The Nomenclature Committee is not the arbiter of such issues. The MetBull > is just like any other publication when it comes to the use such terms, > the product of editing by a group of scientists, and no more or less > authoritative than other publications. > > jeff > > At 08:36 AM 9/2/2005, Greg Hupe wrote: >>Hello Martin and List, >> >>First I would like to correct statement in your email to the list: >>"On the occasion of an ebay auction, namely NWA 2704 "SMB H4". >> >>NWA 2704 is a nice L3.8, S2, W2, not an H4. I believe the meteorite you >>meant to refer to was NWA 2706 which is a beautiful shocked and melted H4. >> >>Here are a couple picture links of NWA 2706 showing the characteristics of >>this beauty: >> >>Click here to view 48.9 gram complete slice displaying breccia >>http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa2706/nwa2706a.jpg >>Click here to view 48.9 gram complete slice displaying abundant metal >>http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa2706/nwa2706b.jpg >> >>The term "Shock Melt Breccia" is a term used by Dr. Bunch at NAU when he >>classified NWA 2706 for me. I am not sure if it is a new term used by the >>NomCom or a preferred term by Dr. Bunch, or if there is a difference >>between an IMB and a SMB. My guess is they are one in the same. I will >>talk to him and ask these questions. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Greg Hupe >>The Hupe Collection >>naturesvault (eBay) >>gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com >>IMCA 2185 >> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Altmann" >><Altmann_at_Meteorite-Martin.de> >>To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >>Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 8:04 AM >>Subject: [meteorite-list] Terminological question: SMB vs. IMB >> >> >>>Hello list, >>> >>>On the occasion of an ebay auction, >>>namely NWA 2704 "SMB H4", >>>I was asked by a collector, what the difference could be between an >>>impact >>>melt breccia IMB and a "shock melt breccia - SMB". >>>Honestly I don't know the difference, as I never heard this term "SMB" >>>before and was thinking, that all shock and melting processes in ordinary >>>chondrites were caused by impacts. >>> From the picture of the auction I can't tell much, as the cut surface of >>>>the >>>specimen is small and it's looking to me not diffrent from an IMB. >>>Is SMB now a term of the official nomenclature and what shall I respond >>>to >>>the collector? >>> >>>Many thanks, >>>Martin >>> >>>______________________________________________ >>>Meteorite-list mailing list >>>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> >>______________________________________________ >>Meteorite-list mailing list >>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Fri 02 Sep 2005 09:27:59 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |