[meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and Intelligent Design

From: Bill Southern <Nugget-Shooter_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri May 13 09:02:46 2005
Message-ID: <000801c557bb$f7557180$0202a8c0_at_yourkgohy9au97>

interesting point of view Phil...

Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Morgan" <pkmorgan_at_ctcweb.net>
To: <cynapse_at_charter.net>; "drtanuki" <drtanuki@yahoo.com>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
Intelligent Design


> Hey Darren,
> That was kind of mean-spirited.
>
> Let's see, if I believe in a God, I'm an inbred nitwit, but if I believe
> that I was rather created by a bacteria that came from somewhere (?) and
> hitched a ride on a meteorite (just to make this a meteorite-related
> topic) I'm quite intelligent? Or was the former only if I believe in a
> young earth?
>
> Until we find a world that was created by bacteria+chance and those
> bacteria learned to write and recorded the whole process for us it's all
> faith - either way.
>
> Interesting topic and if anyone has any proof either way lets discuss that
> rather than making generalities.
>
> Regards to all
> Phil Morgan
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse_at_charter.net>
> To: "drtanuki" <drtanuki_at_yahoo.com>
> Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and
> Intelligent Design
>
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:26 -0700 (PDT), drtanuki <drtanuki_at_yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Dear List,
>> There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA)
>>about what should be taught in schools, Creationism,
>>Evolution or Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design
>>is a new paradigm that states that there was an
>>Intelligence behind the design of the Universe and
>>Creation of Life. What are the views of members on
>>this List?
>
> Intelligent Design is just creationism in an attempted scientific disguise
> so that they can get
> their foot back in the door of the science classrooms. Don't be fooled by
> their pretending to be
> rational-- I'll be willing to be you that AT LEAST 95% of the "Intelligent
> Design" proponents
> pushing for Intelligent Design to be taught are Young Earth Creationists,
> who insist on an age for
> the Earth and Universe at below 10,000 years and a Noachian Deluge.
>
> In other words, inbred nitwits.
>
> http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/barbara_forrest/wedge.html
> http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/features/2000/pigliucci1.html
> http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/vic_stenger/stealth.pdf
> http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/design.html
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Fri 13 May 2005 09:02:02 AM PDT