[meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and Intelligent Design
From: Bill Southern <Nugget-Shooter_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri May 13 09:02:46 2005 Message-ID: <000801c557bb$f7557180$0202a8c0_at_yourkgohy9au97> interesting point of view Phil... Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Morgan" <pkmorgan_at_ctcweb.net> To: <cynapse_at_charter.net>; "drtanuki" <drtanuki@yahoo.com> Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 6:46 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and Intelligent Design > Hey Darren, > That was kind of mean-spirited. > > Let's see, if I believe in a God, I'm an inbred nitwit, but if I believe > that I was rather created by a bacteria that came from somewhere (?) and > hitched a ride on a meteorite (just to make this a meteorite-related > topic) I'm quite intelligent? Or was the former only if I believe in a > young earth? > > Until we find a world that was created by bacteria+chance and those > bacteria learned to write and recorded the whole process for us it's all > faith - either way. > > Interesting topic and if anyone has any proof either way lets discuss that > rather than making generalities. > > Regards to all > Phil Morgan > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse_at_charter.net> > To: "drtanuki" <drtanuki_at_yahoo.com> > Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:12 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kansas Legal Debate: Creation,Evolution and > Intelligent Design > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:54:26 -0700 (PDT), drtanuki <drtanuki_at_yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>Dear List, >> There is now a debate in the Kansas Courts (USA) >>about what should be taught in schools, Creationism, >>Evolution or Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design >>is a new paradigm that states that there was an >>Intelligence behind the design of the Universe and >>Creation of Life. What are the views of members on >>this List? > > Intelligent Design is just creationism in an attempted scientific disguise > so that they can get > their foot back in the door of the science classrooms. Don't be fooled by > their pretending to be > rational-- I'll be willing to be you that AT LEAST 95% of the "Intelligent > Design" proponents > pushing for Intelligent Design to be taught are Young Earth Creationists, > who insist on an age for > the Earth and Universe at below 10,000 years and a Noachian Deluge. > > In other words, inbred nitwits. > > http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/barbara_forrest/wedge.html > http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/features/2000/pigliucci1.html > http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/vic_stenger/stealth.pdf > http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/design.html > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Fri 13 May 2005 09:02:02 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |