[meteorite-list] Did Life Arrive Before the Solar System EvenFormed?

From: Marc Fries <m.fries_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed May 4 17:44:52 2005
Message-ID: <1943.10.17.14.1.1115243047.squirrel_at_webmail.ciw.edu>

Howdy

   I don't like panspermia; not even a little bit. It does nothing to
answer the question of where and how life started in the universe. All
it does is add a few million to billions of years of travel in the
cold, dry, radiation-hard vacuum of space to the journey. That, plus
you've got to crush/heat it in a violent, solar-system-ejecting imact
and then crush/heat it again on the recieving end. Even if you shorten
that journey to a trans-planetary scale you've still done nothing to
answer any questions about how it originated, and you're still dealing
with several physical processes that each alone have the power of
sterilization. And at the end of all of THAT, you've still dropped any
surviving (not bloody likely) microbes into a foreign environment that
they're not adapted to! You can hang "litho" or "nano" or freakin'
"nuclear-powered" or anything you want to onto the front of
"panspermia" and it's still useless as a theory. How annoying that it
still crops up from time to time...

Bah humbug,
MDF

>
>
> http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/lithopanspermia.html
>
> Did Life Arrive Before the Solar System Even Formed?
> Written by Jeff Barbour
> Universe Today
> May 4, 2005
>
> Summary - (May 4, 2005) The theory of panspermia proposes that life
> really gets around, jumping fron planet to planet - or even from star to
> star. Life might be everywhere! Assuming this is true, how do
> single-celled bacteria make the journey through the vacuum of space?
> Easy, they use chunks of rock as space ships, in a process called
> lithopanspermia. And now, researchers from Princeton and the University
> of Michigan think that life carrying rocks might have been right there
> at the beginning of our solar system, keeping their tiny astronauts safe
> and sound, frozen in statis until the planets formed and the right
> conditions let them thaw out, stretch their proteins, and begin a
> process leading from microbe to mankind.
>
> Full Story - Things seem to start simple then get more complex. Life is
> like that. And perhaps nowhere is this notion truer than when we
> investigate the origins of life. Did the earliest single cell
> life-forms coalesce from organic molecules here on Earth? Or is it
> possible that - like dandelions wafting spore above spring grass -
> cosmic winds carry living things from world to world later to take root
> and flourish? And if this is the case, how precisely does such a
> "dia-spora" occur?
>
> 450 years before the common era, Greek philosopher Anaxagoras of Ionia
> proposed that all living things sprung from certain ubiquitous "seeds of
> life". Today's notion of such "seeds" is far more sophisticated than
> anything Anaxagoras could possibly envision - limited as he was to
> simple observations of living things such as budding plant & flowering
> tree, crawling & buzzing insect, loping animal or walking human; not too
> mention natural phenomena like sound, wind, rainbows, earthquakes,
> eclipses, Sun, and Moon. Surprisingly modern in thought, Anaxagoras
> could only guess as to the details...
>
> Some 2300 hundreds years later - during the 1830s - Swedish chemist J?ns
> Jackob Berzelius confirmed that carbon compounds were found in certain
> meteorites "fallen from the heavens". Berzelius himself however, held
> that these carbonates were contaminates originating with the Earth
> itself - but his finding contributed to theories propounded by later
> thinkers including the physician H.E. Richter and physicist Lord Kelvin.
>
> Panspermia received its first real treatment by Hermann von Helmholtz in
> 1879, but it was another Swedish chemist - 1903 Nobel Prize winning
> Svante Arrhenius - who popularized the concept of life originating from
> space in 1908. Perhaps surprisingly, that theory was based on the notion
> that radiation pressure from the Sun - and other stars - "blew" microbes
> about like tiny solar sails - and not as the result of finding carbon
> compounds in stony meteorite.
>
> The theory that simple forms of life travel in ejecta from other worlds
> - embedded in rock blasted from planetary surfaces by the impact of
> large objects - is the basis for "lithopanspermia". There are numerous
> advantages to this hypothesis - simple, hardy forms of life are often
> found in mineral deposits on Earth in forbidding locales. Worlds - such
> as our own or Mars - are occasionally blasted by asteroids and comets
> large enough to hurl rock at speeds exceeding escape velocities. Mineral
> in rocks can shield microbes from shock and radiation (associated with
> impact craters) as well as hard radiation from the Sun as stony meteors
> move through space. The hardiest forms of life also have the ability to
> survive in a cold vacuum by going into stasis - reducing chemical
> interactions to zero while maintaining biological structure well enough
> to later thaw and multiply in more salubrious environs.
>
> In fact several examples of such ejecta are now available on earth for
> scientific analysis. Stony meteors can include some very sophisticated
> forms of organic materials (carbonaceous chondrites have been found that
> include amino and carboxylic acids). Fossilized remnants from Mars in
> particular - though subject to various non-organic interpretations - are
> in the possession of institutions such as NASA. The theory and practice
> of "lithopanspermia" looks very promising - although such a theory can
> only explain where the simplest forms of life come from - and not how it
> originated to begin with.
>
> In a paper entitled "Lithopanspermia in Star Forming Clusters" published
> April 29, 2005, cosmologists Fred C. Adams of the University of Michigan
> Center for Theoretical Physics and David Spergel of the Department of
> Astrophysical Sciences of Princeton University discuss the probability
> of carbonaceous chondrite distribution of microbial life within early
> star clusters. According to the duo, "the chances of biological material
> spreading from one system to another is greatly enhanced ... due to the
> close proximity of the systems and low relative velocities."
>
> According to the authors, previous studies have looked into the
> likelihood that life-bearing rocks (typically exceeding 10 kgs in
> weight) play a role in the spread of life within isolated planetary
> systems and found "the odds of both meteroid and biological transfer are
> exceedingly low." However "odds of transfer increase in more crowded
> environments" and "Since the time scale for planet formation and the
> time that young stars are expected to live in birth clusters are roughly
> comparable, about 10 - 30 million years, debris from planet formation
> has a good chance of being transferred from one solar system to another."
>
> Ultimately Fred and David conclude "young star clusters provide an
> efficient means of transferring rocky material from solar system to
> solar system. If any system in the birth aggregate supports life, then
> many other systems in the cluster can capture life bearing rocks."
>
> To arrive at this conclusion, the duo performed "a series of numerical
> calculations to estimate the distribution of ejection speeds for rocks"
> based on size and mass. They also considered the dynamics of early star
> forming groups and clusters. This was essential to help determine rock
> recapture rates by planets in neighboring systems. Finally they had to
> make certain assumptions about the frequency of life-encapsulated
> materials and the survivability of life-forms embedded within them. All
> this led up to a sense of "the expected number of successful
> lithopanspermia events per cluster."
>
> Based on methods used to arrive at this conclusion and thinking only in
> terms of present distances between solar systems, the duo estimated the
> probability that Earth has exported life to other systems. Over the age
> of life on Earth (some 4.0 Byr) Fred and David estimate that the Earth
> has ejected some 40 billion life-bearing stones. Of the estimated 10
> bio-stones per annum, nearly 1 (0.9) will land on a planet suitable for
> further growth and proliferation.
>
> Most cosmologists tend to address the "hard-science questions" of the
> origin of the Universe as a whole. Fred says that "exobiology is
> intrinsically interesting" to him and that he and "David were summer
> students together in New York in 1981" where they worked on "issues
> related to planetary atmospheres and climate, issues that are close to
> questions of exobiology." Fred also says that he "spends a healthy
> fraction of research time on problems associated with star and planet
> formation." Fred acknowledges David's special role in thinking "up the
> idea of looking at panspermia in clusters; when we talked about it, it
> became clear that we had all the pieces of the puzzle. We just had to
> put them together."
>
> This interdisciplinary approach to cosmology and exobiology also led
> Fred and David to look at the question of lithopanspermia between
> clusters themselves. Again using methods developed to explore the
> proliferation of life within clusters, and later applied to the
> exportation of life from the Earth itself to other non-solar system
> planets, Fred and David were able to conclude that "a young cluster is
> more likely to capture life from outside than to give rise to life
> spontaneously." And "Once seeded, the cluster provides an effective
> amplification mechanism to infect other members" within that cluster
> itself.
>
> Ultimately however, Fred and David can not answer the question of where
> and under what conditions the first seeds of life took form. In fact,
> they are willing to admit that "if the spontaneous origin of life were
> sufficiently common, there would be no need for any panspermia mechanism
> to explain the presence of life."
>
> But according to Fred and David, once life gets a foothold somewhere, it
> manages to get around quite handily.
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>

-- 
Marc Fries
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Carnegie Institution of Washington
Geophysical Laboratory
5251 Broad Branch Rd. NW
Washington, DC 20015
PH:  202 478 7970
FAX: 202 478 8901
-----
I urge you to show your support to American servicemen and servicewomen
currently serving in harm's way by donating items they personally request
at:
http://www.anysoldier.com
(This is not an endorsement by the Geophysical Laboratory or the Carnegie
Institution.)

Received on Wed 04 May 2005 05:44:07 PM PDT