[meteorite-list] Re: Tektite pitting
From: Sterling K. Webb <kelly_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat Mar 26 18:25:35 2005 Message-ID: <4245EEA6.BCAE1B4F_at_bhil.com> Hi, Bob, Marc, List, The question of what has caused the shapes and surface features of tektites has been a long term argument for most of a century. When it comes to surface features, the opinions have been many. Australites (for an example) come in a whole variety of surface textures. The grayish randomly rough surfaces are almost certainly the result of erosion, either aeolian, fluvial, or possibly chemical weathering. The gray color is because they are essentially ground glass. It has been shown that acid environments will attack a tektite and produce such a surface . But the dark mirror-like smooth and glassy surfaces are usually regarded as pristine and original. They certainly look it. Oddly, it possible to have both etched and unetched surfaces on the same tektite. I have a big chunker that is lenticular, hexagonal, with glassy facets around the edges (both sides) and a frothy dark super-pitted chaos in the centers. Was it spinning wildly as it re-entered? But the point is, the froamy pitted surface (on both sides) could not be the result of erosion or devitrification if the glassy surfaces on the same tektite are pristine and untouched. These dark and unscratched surfaces without a smooth mirror finish are the puzzle; they show pitting, "worm track," and a bewildering array of fine detail and specialized characteristics. These have most frequently been held to be aerodynamic re-entry effects. Explaining all the observed features as aerodynamic in origin is challenge, though. For example, there is a sub-set of philippinites that have deep prominent grooves, not numerous, that wander around the tektite in a connected fashion. (I think they are all rizalites from bikol province, but that's from memory.) These grooves are U-shaped in cross section, that cross section being being very uniform in dimension. And, here's the kicker, the walls of the grooves are pristine, glassy mirror surfaces. This would suggest that the grooves were cut by very hot plasma in re-entry, but how? They are a maddening aerodynamic puzzle. The grooves often intersect each other cleanly, usually at near 90 degrees. But if the damn thing is in re-entry plasma, why does it not surround the object (compare to meteorites and their fusion crust.) and etch it everywhere or at least on all sides but one. And how to account for the differing orientations? Tektites, BTW, almost never show the aerodynamic features we all know from meteorites (nose cones, rollover lips, secondary and tertiary surfaces) except for possible exception of "frothy" backsides, but since tektites are not blocky like most meteorites, a backside is hard to identify. This is damn odd, considering that both are rocks re-entering at the same hypersonic velocities through the same atmosphere! Possibly it's because many? most? all? tektites are in the liquid or at least plastic phase for the duration of the trip and do not resist aerodynamic forces like a nice cold rock would. Still, I'm bothered... We know that at least some tektites are plastic when they land. There's the taffy-pull-and-break tektites of Ninninger. And just ask Norm Lehrman about "splatforms"! And while you're at it, ask how come "starburst" tektites? At any rate, many of the surface features remain a puzzle as far as exact mechanism is concerned. Sterling Webb ------------------------------------------- Bob King wrote: > I have always been fascinated with tektites and enjoy the topic. Regarding > the pitted surfaces of indochinites and other tektites, is this a result of > devitrification (or some other sort of erosive action) or were these pits > formed at the time of creation from escaping gases and water vapor? > Thanks for your help with the question. > Bob > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Sat 26 Mar 2005 06:22:14 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |