[meteorite-list] metorwrongs...

From: Tom Knudson <peregrineflier_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Mar 24 16:14:52 2005
Message-ID: <005001c530b6$860a24c0$2d107918_at_Michelle>

Hi Bob and list.
"My main point is that even legal terms are defined by
common usage, and the common usage of "meteorwrong"
isn't applied to "everything that isn't properly
classified"."

I have to agree with Bob, according to Manoj, Dean Bessey is the worlds
largest supplier of meteor-wrongs, I don't think so!

Thanks, Tom
peregrineflier <><
IMCA 6168
http://www.frontiernet.net/~peregrineflier/Peregrineflier.htm
http://fstop.proboards24.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Verish" <bolidechaser_at_yahoo.com>
To: <manojpai_at_yahoo.com>
Cc: "Meteorite-list Meteoritecentral" <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] metorwrongs...


> Hi Manoj,
>
> You wrote:
> "Hope this help. ;-)"
>
> No, Manoj, as you may have already surmised, this does
> not help at all. You should advise your "legal
> advisor" to go back and research this some more.
> Until then, the advice you were given should only be
> considered as one lawyer's opinion.
>
> The main point of disagreement is with the statement
> that everything is a "meteorwrong until it is properly
> classified". It is a fact that there are many
> meteorites that are properly IDENTIFIED, but which
> have never been and never will be classified.
>
> Your legal advisor seems to be implying that most
> meteoriticists consider anything that isn't properly
> classified by them to be a "meteorwrong". I have
> rarely seen them use that term in print, and have
> never heard them use it on any unexamined specimen.
>
> I'm not saying that there is a common consensus on how
> the term "meteor-wrong" is defined, but it would be
> safe to say that the majority opinion would hold that
> a "term TBD" becomes a "meteorite" only after a
> qualified professional has IDENTIFIED it as such. But
> should that same expert deem the "term TBD" to be NOT
> a meteorite, at that point in time it becomes that
> other thing, whatever you wish to call it, but which
> has been commonly called a "meteorwrong".
>
> My main point is that even legal terms are defined by
> common usage, and the common usage of "meteorwrong"
> isn't applied to "everything that isn't properly
> classified".
>
> Bob V.
>
> ------------- Original Message -------------
> [meteorite-list] metorwrongs...
> Manoj Pai manojpai at yahoo.com
> Thu Mar 24 13:04:17 EST 2005
>
> > Someone has just asked me an interesting question,
> > what do you call a "potential meteorite" that isn't
> > a 'meteorite' nor a confirmed 'meteorwrong'
>
> I would not like to spoil the fun of most of you, but
> would like to point out that I asked this question to
> our legal advisor, here. After going through some of
> the info on a few sites and books, he concluded, that
> the 'potential meteorite' will continue to be called a
> meteorwrong, untill classified and identified as a
> meteorite. Hope this help. ;-)
>
> Manoj Pai
> Ahmedabad, INDIA
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.1 - Release Date: 3/23/2005
>
>
Received on Thu 24 Mar 2005 04:14:53 PM PST