[meteorite-list] NWA 2906, NWA 869

From: Meteoriteshow <meteoriteshow_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Jun 17 02:45:09 2005
Message-ID: <004301c57308$19158320$0500a8c0_at_IBM>

Hi All,
There are still some L's from the Sahara that are not called '869'! YES!
As you probably know we have some Acfer and Tanezrouft meteorites that are not '869' and that will become more and more rare as it
is now impossible to go and hunt for meteorites in Algeria... Enjoy!
http://meteoriteshow.free.fr/meteoriteshow%20angl/pages%20navigation/gallery-navbanner-contact.html
Those of you who will be in Ensisheim and Ste Marie can see them for real!!!
All the best,

Frederic Beroud
http://www.meteoriteshow.com
IMCA member # 2491 (http://www.imca.cc/)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Knudson" <peregrineflier_at_npgcable.com>
To: "Jeff Pringle" <jlp3_at_earthlink.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 2906, NWA 869


> Hi Jeff, I sure agree! My feelings are that if you had a witnessed fall in
> Tucson during the show and witnessed by 200 dealers and if it looks anything
> like 869 they would call it 869 and accuse someone of dropping it from a
> plane! It is all over for L's because of 869, now they all will be called
> 869 by someone! : )
> Bob summed it up when he said "I don't care if it was purchased in Siberia
> its still 869", if it's an L it is now considered 869.
>
> Thanks, Tom
> peregrineflier <><
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Pringle" <jlp3_at_earthlink.net>
> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:09 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 2906, NWA 869
>
>
> > Bob wrote:
> > "With all due respect.............. that's NWA 869."
> >
> > See, I would have said that had too much rust staining (aren't those
> > chondrules a little vague as well?)to be 869...though I don't claim to be
> an
> > expert. I have bought a couple unclassified stones (allegedly from
> Rissani)
> > that look waaay more 869ish than those photos.
> > I still think them what claim to know this mysterious meteorite ought to
> > step up to the plate (out on that limb?) and say what makes 869
> > distinctively 869.
> > Greenish tint to crust?
> > Bluish tint to matrix?
> > List the clast types?
> > Describe, in some way, something?
> > Haven't you noticed that when you get ten people saying " you know it when
> > you see it", at least two of those people are talking about something else
> > entirely?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.4/16 - Release Date: 6/15/2005
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Fri 17 Jun 2005 02:45:05 AM PDT