[meteorite-list] Steve Arnold #1 full of #2???

From: Michael Farmer <meteoritehunter_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Jul 13 19:46:51 2005
Message-ID: <00a401c58805$1fe51cd0$0200a8c0_at_S0031628003>

Can we stop this idiotic thread? This has nothing to do with anything.
Mike Farmer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Knudson" <peregrineflier_at_npgcable.com>
To: <MeteorHntr_at_aol.com>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Steve Arnold #1 full of #2???


> Steve Arnold The First wrote;
> (I am not sure I like that term "#1" anymore, it kind of is leaving a
> strange taste in my mouth all of a sudden...)
>
> Well I can assure you it tastes better than # 2
>
> Thanks, Tom
> peregrineflier <><
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <MeteorHntr_at_aol.com>
> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:41 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Steve Arnold #1 full of #2???
>
>
>> Hey list,
>>
>> I was going to wait a little longer and let that last post of mine "soak
> in" a little more before following up, but I am going to be out of the
> house
> for much of this evening, and I was a little concerned it might start to
> smell too bad unless I cleaned it up first.
>>
>> Sometimes I forget that this is a "serious scientific list," and that
>> some
> people here might not understand or appreciate strange "Arkansas humor"
> (also now known as "#1 and #2 humor"). So...
>>
>> No, #2 did NOT really do #1 on the floor at our party.
>>
>> While some have accused me, #1, of being full of #2, I am confident that
> this last post proves them right.
>>
>> I wrote all that last post to make my original point: if it were 75%
> factually correct, which I am sure (even with the typos) it was more than
> 75% correct, it still paints a very inaccurate picture of what really
> happened that night at our party. Such is the case with all too many of
> the
> meteorite stories we all see out there in the professional media, because
> you do expect the media to be right nearly all of the time, and at worst
> just a little biased.
>>
>> Then their so called "corrections" get buried in small print on page #29D
> (if a meteorite article was ever "corrected" at all).
>>
>> At least here on the list our follow up, comments and corrections get the
> same exposure as the original mistakes.
>>
>> Anyway, I appreciate Mr. Arnold #2 of Chicago being a good sport about
> this once again, and for you all bearing with a topic that did seem to go
> off topic, if not at least off colored.
>>
>> You gotta love this place! Long live the meteorite list.
>>
>> Steve Arnold
>> The First
>> (I am not sure I like that term "#1" anymore, it kind of is leaving a
> strange taste in my mouth all of a sudden...)
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.14/48 - Release Date: 7/13/2005
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Wed 13 Jul 2005 07:46:37 PM PDT