[meteorite-list] Deep Impact Was a Dust-up, Not a Gusher

From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Jul 8 19:39:18 2005
Message-ID: <200507082338.j68NcUs04417_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov>

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/pr0523.html

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Press Release No.: 05-23
For Immediatie Release: July 8, 2005

Deep Impact Was a Dust-up, Not a Gusher

Cambridge, MA - Smithsonian astronomers watched as the "Impactor" probe
from NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft hit Comet Tempel 1 earlier this week.
They monitored the impact using the ground-based Submillimeter Array
(SMA) in Hawaii and NASA's orbiting Submillimeter Wave Astronomy
Satellite (SWAS). Results are still coming in, but so far the scientists
report seeing only weak emission from water vapor and a host of other
gases that were expected to erupt from the impact site. The most
conspicuous feature of the blast was brightening due to sunlight
scattered by the ejected dust.

"It's pretty clear that this event did not produce a gusher," said SWAS
principal investigator Gary Melnick of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center
for Astrophysics (CfA). "The more optimistic predictions for water
output from the impact haven't materialized, at least not yet."

Astronomer Charlie Qi (CfA) expressed surprise at these results. He
explained that short-period comets like Tempel 1 have been baked
repeatedly by the sun during their passages through the inner solar
system. The effects of that heat are estimated to extend more than three
feet beneath the surface of the nucleus. But the Deep Impact indicates
that these effects could be much deeper.

"Theories about the volatile layers below the surface of short-period
comets are going to have to be revised," Qi said.

As seen from Earth, a comet typically displays a fuzzy round head and a
glowing tail. Both the head and tail consist of gases and dust ejected
from the comet's nucleus - a frozen chunk of rock and ice about half the
size of Manhattan Island.

Five decades ago, Harvard astronomer Fred Whipple developed a model of
comet nuclei as "dirty snowballs." He hypothesized that comets consist
of mostly ice with some dirt and rock mixed in. Modern astronomers often
refer to comets as "icy dirtballs" instead, reflecting the prevailing
view that comets contain more dust and less ice than previously believed.

Deep Impact was intended to test these theories by excavating material
from the comet's interior, giving scientists clues to its composition
and structure. The mission succeeded admirably, pulverizing a section of
the comet larger than a house and releasing tons of material into space.

SWAS operators were puzzled by the lack of increased water vapor from
Tempel 1. Post-impact measurements showed the comet was releasing only
about 550 pounds of water per second-an emission rate very similar to
pre-impact values, and less than seen by SWAS during natural outbursts
in the weeks before the impact.

SMA measurements corroborate the SWAS findings. Although the SMA wasn't
tuned to frequencies of water emission, which are difficult to observe
from the ground due to atmospheric water vapor, it watched for other
chemicals such as hydrogen cyanide. SMA astronomers saw little increase
in production of gases following the impact. Gas production rates
remained so low that they could set only an upper limit on the total.

"All we needed was a factor of three boost from the impact to get a
definite detection," said Qi. "We didn't see that."

Qi added that the comet might become more active over the following days
and weeks. "We're still hoping for a big outgassing from the new active
area created by Deep Impact. If we see any signs of that, we'll make
more observations."

The researchers will continue their careful and detailed analysis in
order to interpret the SMA and SWAS measurements and what they indicate
about the comet's composition.

"The big picture will emerge once astronomers meld data from different
observatories at different wavelengths," said Melnick.

Headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics (CfA) is a joint collaboration between the Smithsonian
Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory. CfA
scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin,
evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.

For more information, contact:

David Aguilar, Director of Public Affairs
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Phone: 617-495-7462 Fax: 617-495-7468
daguilar_at_cfa.harvard.edu

Christine Pulliam
Public Affairs Specialist
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Phone: 617-495-7463, Fax: 617-495-7016
cpulliam_at_cfa.harvard.edu
Received on Fri 08 Jul 2005 07:38:29 PM PDT