AW: AW: [meteorite-list] Ad- best deal on CV7 meteorite in the galaxy!

From: Bernhard Rems <bernhard_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Jan 27 07:57:12 2005
Message-ID: <000201c5046f$b43a0770$a615170a_at_PDO>

But nowhere does it state that it is a CV7?

Bernhard

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: stan . [mailto:laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2005 13:29
An: bernhard_at_bgrems.com; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: RE: AW: [meteorite-list] Ad- best deal on CV7 meteorite in the
galaxy!

I didnt know it was ever considered an aure - but YES it was orignially
classified as an L7, then NAU went back and reclassified it as a primitive
achonderite and consider it to be paired with nwa 3133

you can go to:
http://www4.nau.edu/meteorite/index.html for NAU's systematic description of

emteorites, then click on 'primitive achonderites at the bottom of the page'

the nwa 3133/1839 description is halfway down the page


>From: "Bernhard Rems" <bernhard_at_bgrems.com>
>To: "'stan .'"
><laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>,<meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] Ad- best deal on CV7 meteorite in the galaxy!
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:54:42 +0100
>
>
>Just to get my records straight:
>
>NWA 1839 (which I am lucky enough to own a 1.5g very thin slice) was first
>thought to be a L7, then an AURE - and now is officially listed as CV7?
>
>Bernhard
>
>
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Thu 27 Jan 2005 07:56:59 AM PST