[meteorite-list] meteoroid temperature-Assumptions(P. III)
From: MexicoDoug_at_aol.com <MexicoDoug_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Jan 7 05:36:24 2005 Message-ID: <145.3ca1c636.2f0fc021_at_aol.com> Part III So the directional answer is best gotten to by a bunch of assumptions and simplifications, including that the thing is rotating on a nice skewer and isn't too big so that depth becomes an issue, which adds some calculus for all those onion rinds. So sticking to something say a couple of meters in diameter... Otherwise we deal with things like what is the temperature of Mercury (Solar side, mass, backside, transition zone, latitude, rotation, greenhouse effect if any, and composition which will affect what radiation can be absorbed and converted into heat. A simple way to think about the latter is thinking about a microwave oven. If the object to be heated is made with lots of water, it has a strong absorbance in that range, but the glass door doesn't (even on the inside). So a Tektite sent in orbit very well could have a lower temperature than a cometary water containing carbonaceous type body which in turn creates nice effects in part due to these warmings in the estelas. An example like Mercury, of one not rotating with respect to the Sun causes other complications. So best to think of an ant in a spacesuit when asking your question. The center of the meteoroid will be cooler at its equilibrium temperature so wherever the ant walks or burrows will depend on the temperature. Average temperature is a much easier proposition, but knowing that wouldn't help the ant's survival chances at all if he ends up in the Ant:-)arctic vs. Sahara of the meteoroid. If one assumes that a meteoroid has no greenhouse effect and is made of stone or iron-nickel, and absorbs typically a full spectrum in the range of what the sun mainly radiates for heating i.e. UV-Visible light, lots of simplifying assumptions can be made. You can look at Venus and see what a Greenhouse effect does, or even Jupiter, which I suspect is somehat warmer still than the NASA page reference I used, because it actually puts out more energy than it received that little stunted star...or figure out at what distance comets get tails (snowball's sublimation temperature). You get the idea:) The basics would include the following, I would think, calling the meteoroid shape a sphere for simplification, which of course is not true but good enough, also that the Sun is like a Black Body at 5800 degrees K from Wein's Law. Taken together with the idea that radiation from any source drops off as the square of the distance from the source. (Which is understandable by knowing that the surface area of a sphere, ie, non-directional emmiting source, 4*Pi*r^2 increases by the square of the radius.), you can get a handle on temperature caused by the Sun on objects floating in the Solar System. And in the case of the meteroid, we only get a quarter of the total area exposed to the Sun in the simplified case of a spherical meteoroid (area sphere = 4*pi*r^2 vs. great circle exposed = pi*r^2, a factor of 1/4). Using the two laws in a numer of ways, but sparing the the tedious math, the Sun's photosphere ("surface") clocks at near 5800 degrees K being basically a heat source (150,000,000 km from earth minus Sun's radius, aww lets just say the center of the Sun since we can then measure in AU and are not dealing generally with the inner Solar System to make a huge difference with the Sun's 700,000 km or so radius. Using the inverse square law then you get the energies in my table I gave you. Then, I derived the temperature in the above table (all in an excel spreadsheet) using the Stephan-Boltzmann Law, for you with this exact formula: T = [R/sigma*(a/e)*(areacrosssec/areatot)*(1/R^2)]^(1/4) and substituded the differewnt absorptivities and emissivities...presto, a solar meteorite thermometer. You can graph them too and it is easy to look at, but I couldn't figure out how to graph in plain text for the list:) Saludos, Doug Wheeew! I think I'll take some time off the list and build some solar collectors and spacecraft housings for my old Chevy now. On second thought, maybe I'll just change the oil, if I get a chance...Acadamian Bah:( Received on Fri 07 Jan 2005 05:36:17 AM PST |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |