[meteorite-list] NWA 1827

From: Michael Farmer <meteoritehunter_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Jan 7 00:17:31 2005
Message-ID: <006101c4f478$40253690$0200a8c0_at_S0031628003>

Adam, get real, even the people on this list asked why you had to act like
that when a simple statement to the fact that you had spoken to Teb Bunch
would have solved the problem instantly.
You refused to do that, dragging out something for no reason other than what
we can all see, you are trying to provoke a fight.
I am not interested.
I love the pot calling the kettle black though.
I think we all know the fact that you yourself have done more piggybacking
than anyone. I spoke with Jason Phillips and Rob Wesel, both confirmed that
you gave them my NWA 1906 and NWA 1929 numbers.
You denied it to me on the phone.
Who is lying?
I am off to Oman tomorrow, so dont worry, this ends here for me. I will be
gone two weeks and not really having time since I'll be on a true meteorite
expedition to the other side of the globe.
Mike Farmer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
To: "Michael Farmer" <meteoritehunter_at_comcast.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1827


> Hi Mike,
>
> You were using Nelson's lab sample number NWA 1827 when you were assigned
> number NWA 1912. You continue to use NWA 1878 that applies to samples in
> our collection that we never provided to you. I am not going to open up
> the
> piggy-backing can of worms again but want to make it clear that these
> numbers are important. It is important to keep track and police numbers
> you
> are involved with. In the latest case a simple phone call on your behalf
> would have shown you were in error using NWA 2620 instead of going back
> and
> forth with me on the List.
>
> All the best,
>
> Adam
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Farmer" <meteoritehunter_at_comcast.net>
> To: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>; "David Weir"
> <dgweir_at_earthlink.net>
> Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1827
>
>
>> I guess then Adam, that the paper that David Weir just posted is fake?
>> I guess I sent samples to Ted Bunch and he trashed them?
>> Adam, I am not sure what you are getting at, but I am a little curious.
>> Mike Farmer
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
>> To: "David Weir" <dgweir_at_earthlink.net>
>> Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1827
>>
>>
>> > Hi David,
>> >
>> > NWA 1817 and NWA 1827 came up before on the List as far as
>> > piggy-backing
>> > goes. We informed the List that we own the main mass of NWA 1817.
>> > Another
>> > List member said that Dr. Bunch said it was OK for the number NWA 1827
> to
>> > be
>> > used. I am saying this statement is false because Dr. Bunch did not
> study
>> > NWA 1827 and would not say it is OK to use somebody else's lab number.
>> >
>> > Hope this clears this one up,
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "David Weir" <dgweir_at_earthlink.net>
>> > To: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_attbi.com>
>> > Cc: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:07 PM
>> > Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 1827
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hello Adam,
>> >>
>> >> I was following the thread today regarding Mike's incorrect numbering
> of
>> >> his olivine diogenite (NWA 2629) - I have also corrected my reference
> to
>> >> this stone on my website. Curiously, you also made a reference to NWA
>> >> 1827 which I must admit has me confused as to your intended meaning. I
>> >> have remained interested in this rare 2C meso (still tentative?) since
>> >> first reading about the first creation of this subtype by Hewins in
>> >> 1988, and seeing Dr. Irving's initial description (see my webpage). In
>> >> your post to Mike and the list you wrote --
>> >>
>> >> > Also no verbal pairing assignments were made by Dr. Bunch in
>> >> > regards to NWA 1827 which was studied by Dr. Irving at the UW not
> NAU.
>> >>
>> >> Surely you are familiar with the paper published by Bunch, Irving,
>> >> Wittke, and Kuehner (see link) which suggests the pairing of NWA 1827
>> >> with NWA 1879/1882/1912/1951/1982/3055/other(1645), with a combined
>> >> weight of at least 26.4 kg.
>> >>
>> >> <http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2004/pdf/5163.pdf>
>> >>
>> >> I'm sure I must be misunderstanding your statement above, and maybe I
>> >> shouldn't even care, but I'm just interested to know if what you were
>> >> telling Mike is perhaps some revised info that I also need to know to
>> >> keep my webpage accurate... however, not if it's some private
>> >> disagreement between you and he that doesn't belong on this list.
> Thanks
>> >> for any additional insight about this rare meso 2C.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> David Weir "Tuc-soon-bound"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________________________
>> >> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> >> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________
>> > Meteorite-list mailing list
>> > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Fri 07 Jan 2005 12:17:52 AM PST