[meteorite-list] NWA 1827

From: Michael Farmer <meteoritehunter_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Jan 6 22:58:03 2005
Message-ID: <000601c4f46d$2d4166d0$0200a8c0_at_S0031628003>

I guess then Adam, that the paper that David Weir just posted is fake?
I guess I sent samples to Ted Bunch and he trashed them?
Adam, I am not sure what you are getting at, but I am a little curious.
Mike Farmer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
To: "David Weir" <dgweir_at_earthlink.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1827


> Hi David,
>
> NWA 1817 and NWA 1827 came up before on the List as far as piggy-backing
> goes. We informed the List that we own the main mass of NWA 1817.
> Another
> List member said that Dr. Bunch said it was OK for the number NWA 1827 to
> be
> used. I am saying this statement is false because Dr. Bunch did not study
> NWA 1827 and would not say it is OK to use somebody else's lab number.
>
> Hope this clears this one up,
>
> Adam
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Weir" <dgweir_at_earthlink.net>
> To: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_attbi.com>
> Cc: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:07 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 1827
>
>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> I was following the thread today regarding Mike's incorrect numbering of
>> his olivine diogenite (NWA 2629) - I have also corrected my reference to
>> this stone on my website. Curiously, you also made a reference to NWA
>> 1827 which I must admit has me confused as to your intended meaning. I
>> have remained interested in this rare 2C meso (still tentative?) since
>> first reading about the first creation of this subtype by Hewins in
>> 1988, and seeing Dr. Irving's initial description (see my webpage). In
>> your post to Mike and the list you wrote --
>>
>> > Also no verbal pairing assignments were made by Dr. Bunch in
>> > regards to NWA 1827 which was studied by Dr. Irving at the UW not NAU.
>>
>> Surely you are familiar with the paper published by Bunch, Irving,
>> Wittke, and Kuehner (see link) which suggests the pairing of NWA 1827
>> with NWA 1879/1882/1912/1951/1982/3055/other(1645), with a combined
>> weight of at least 26.4 kg.
>>
>> <http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2004/pdf/5163.pdf>
>>
>> I'm sure I must be misunderstanding your statement above, and maybe I
>> shouldn't even care, but I'm just interested to know if what you were
>> telling Mike is perhaps some revised info that I also need to know to
>> keep my webpage accurate... however, not if it's some private
>> disagreement between you and he that doesn't belong on this list. Thanks
>> for any additional insight about this rare meso 2C.
>>
>> Regards,
>> David Weir "Tuc-soon-bound"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Thu 06 Jan 2005 10:58:27 PM PST