[meteorite-list] AD - 86 Auctions - A Case for Mercury?

From: Rob Wesel <nakhladog_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue Dec 20 15:18:57 2005
Message-ID: <005101c605a2$8818df10$59681618_at_robewcufk0z2s3>

 I was surprised too, so much in fact that I didn't bother reading it in the
Bethany Holiday Catalog figuring it was BS as no authors were listed. Now to
see it is a real article composed by some long standing and reliable names,
I share in David's guarded optimism and I am pleased to see science stepping
outside of the box and taking a swing at defining the angrites better. This
will undoubtedly be further discussed and contested, I applaud the folks at
UW, NAU, and Carnegie for taking that first step.

Rob Wesel
http://www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
------------------
We are the music makers...
and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Weir" <dgweir_at_earthlink.net>
To: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] AD - 86 Auctions - A Case for Mercury?


> Hello Adam and List,
>
> Adam wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------------
> A very interesting abstract titled "Unique Angrite NWA 2999: The Case For
> Samples From Mercury" can be found at the incredibly long link below. The
> TKW for the official designation, NWA 2999 consisting of a dozen stones
> which were each studied individually is 392 grams not the reported amount
> in the abstract although additional pairings have been found. Under a
> different designation which has yet to be assigned, the pairings have
> already been locked down for study or were permanently acquired by two
> major collections.
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Congratulations again on your new angrite, I love my specimen. Certain
> constraints of a mercurian origin for angrites that were in the literature
> previously have been pretty well explained in this abstract, and I am a
> bit more optimistic now that the possibility is real... cautiously
> optimistic at least. I have a webpage that provides a glimse into the
> current investigation of the indicators of a mercurian meteorite:
>
> http://meteoritestudies.com/protected_MERCURY.HTM
>
> As for your NWA 2999, I have been made aware of a dealer publicly selling
> this same angrite as NWA 3164 in his Holiday 2005 catalog. He has quoted
> verbatim the significant parts from both the classification abstract and
> the main points of the abstract from the AGU Fall Meeting that you
> referenced in your post, for which you and your brother are co-authors. It
> may be plagiarism or copyrite violation, but it certainly is poor business
> ethics. I was a bit shocked by this dealer's blatent disrespect for not
> giving the proper credit to the original authors, but instead has simply
> copied word for word and inserted his NWA number where NWA 2999 was
> before. He also hypes his new angrite as "Planet Mercury Meteorite
> Discovery!" I really shouldn't expect better from this particular dealer,
> and will remain cautious of his tactics.
>
> David
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Tue 20 Dec 2005 03:18:24 PM PST