[meteorite-list] 2003 UB313 Update
From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon Aug 15 01:36:57 2005 Message-ID: <200508150535.j7F5ZwX16837_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov> http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/planetlila/index.html 2003 UB313 Update Mike Brown Update on the name on status We have recently discussed the status of the object and of the name with members of the IAU who decide such things. As far as we can determine several activities are taking place: * A special committee of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) is trying to decide precisely what to classify this as. * Another committee of the IAU which vets names for asteroids and Kuiper belt objects is mulling over the name that we suggested upon discovery. * Yet another committee of the IAU which approves names for features on major planets and satellites has suggested that if the object is declared a major planet the naming falls strictly to them, and they have suggested that the name should continue the Greco-Roman tradition of the previous planets. We have a couple of interesting choices in mind in that case. It appears that with the dead month of August rolling around no one will be making decision anytime soon, though the IAU has recently made an official pronouncement (http://www.iau.org/IAU/FAQ/2003_UB313.html) Update on upcoming Spitzer observations Though we tried earlier to measure the size using Spitzer, those observations failed due to human error which caused the telescope to point in the wrong direction. The Spitzer Space Telescope rarely makes such errors, but these observations were extremely unusual in that they were of a moving object whose position could not be obtained from pubically available web sites at JPL (since JPL didn't yet know of the existence of the object). Instead, a string of human interaction had to occur between our [correct] submission of the orbital elements and the final pointing of the telescope. Somewhere in this string of interactions a mistake was made. Two other Kuiper belt objects (2003 EL61 and 2005 FY9) were observed in the same manner at the same time and the observations proceeded without a glitch, leading us to initially assume that the 2003 UB313 observations were correctly pointed also. The mistake was caught by one of the many extremely careful members of the Spitzer Science Center. As soon as the mistake was caught new observations were scheduled and safeguards were put into place to prevent such an occurence again. Spitzer will again attempt to observe 2003 UB313 at the end of the month. In the meantime, we are attempting observing from the 30-meter IRAM telescope. This telescope, like Spitzer, measures the heat output. But IRAM measures the heat output in a region of the spectrum where much less heat is output. Nonetheless we have high hopes that these observations will succeed. The combination of Spitzer and IRAM will be especially powerful. Yet another step to try to measure the size will be to observe the planet with the Hubble Space Telescope and see if we can do some very careful analysis to measure the size in a similar manner as we did for the planetoid Quaoar. These observations are already scheduled and will be taking place shortly, though the observations are optimzed for detection of satellite rather than size measurement. We are attempting to secure observations optimized for size measurement. Received on Mon 15 Aug 2005 01:35:58 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |