[meteorite-list] Uranium/Lead Dating Provides Most Accurate Date Yet for Earth's Largest Extinction

From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon Sep 20 13:30:37 2004
Message-ID: <200409201730.KAA13028_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov>

      
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/09/16_uranium.shtml

Uranium/lead dating provides most accurate date yet for Earth's largest
extinction

By Robert Sanders
UC Berkeley Press Release
16 September 2004

BERKELEY - A new study by geologists at the Berkeley Geochronology
Center and the University of California, Berkeley, improves upon a
widely used dating technique, opening the possibility of a vastly more
accurate time scale for major geologic events in Earth's history.

In a paper published this week in Science, geochemist Roland Mundil of
the Berkeley Geochronology Center (BGC) and his colleagues at BGC and UC
Berkeley report that uranium/lead (U/Pb) dating can be extremely
accurate - to within 250,000 years - but only if the zircons from
volcanic ash used in the analysis are specially treated. To date,
zircons - known to many as a semiprecious stone and December's
birthstone - have often produced confusing and inaccurate results.

"Zircons have produced complicated data that are hard to interpret,
though people have pulled dates out," said Mundil, a former UC Berkeley
postdoctoral fellow now at the BGC, a non-profit scientific research
institute dedicated to perfecting dating techniques for establishing the
history of Earth and life on Earth. "Many of these studies will now have
to be redone."

The U/Pb isotopic dating technique has been critical in dating geologic
events more than 100 million years old, including volcanic eruptions,
continental movements and mass extinctions.

"The beauty of this new technique is that we now can analyze samples we
previously could not get an accurate date for," Mundil said. "This will
have a big impact on radio-isotopic dating in general."

Mundil and his colleagues, including BGC director Paul Renne, adjunct
professor of earth and planetary science at UC Berkeley, used this
improved U/Pb technique to establish a more accurate date for the end of
the Permian period and the beginning of the Triassic period - 252.6
million years ago, plus or minus 200,000 years. This boundary coincides
with the largest extinction of life on Earth, when most marine
invertebrates died out, including the well-known flat, segmented trilobites.

Based on the improved U/Pb technique, the team also established that the
argon/argon (Ar/Ar) isotopic dating technique that Renne employed for an
earlier study of the Permian-Triassic boundary consistently gives
younger dates, by about 1 percent. Renne ascribes this to a lack of a
precise measurement of the decay constant of potassium. The technique is
based on the fact that the naturally occurring isotope potassium-40
decays to argon-40 with a 1.25 billion year half-life. Comparison of the
amount of argon-39 produced in a nuclear reactor to the amount of
argon-40 gives a measure of the age of the rocks.

Uranium, on the other hand, is so well studied that its decay constant
is much better known, making the U/Pb dating technique more accurate,
Mundil noted. U/Pb dating relies upon the decay of naturally occurring
uranium and different isotopes of lead.

"Further application of Mundil's approach will make the geologic time
scale more accurate, letting us calibrate extinctions and important
events in Earth's history, ranging from 100 million to several billion
years ago, with unparalleled accuracy," Renne added.

The new U/Pb date, though about 2.5 million years older than Renne
reported nine years ago based on Ar/Ar dating, nevertheless confirms his
conclusion that the Permian extinction occurred at the same time as a
major series of volcanic eruptions in Siberia. This is strong evidence
that these eruptions caused, at least in part, the global die-off, which
some scientists have ascribed to a meteor impact.

Mundil noted that in 1998, one group used U/Pb dating to assign a date
of 251.4 million years ago for the main pulse of the Permina extinction,
in apparent conflict with the new U/Pb age. That 'age,' however, "is
based on interpretation of a very complicated data set," Mundil said.

Mundil and his colleagues set out to resolve the issue, using a new
zircon pretreatment invented by UC Santa Barbara isotope geologist James
M. Mattinson. The problem with using microscopic zircons, which are
prevalent in volcanic ash, is that the decay of uranium to lead is so
energetic that the lead atoms smash through and destroy the zircon
crystal structure, which apparently allows some lead to leak out of the
crystal, throwing off the analysis. Geologists have tried various zircon
treatments, including abrading the outer surfaces of the crystals, which
are typically a tenth of a millimeter across, or leaching the crystals
with strong acid. Despite these treatments, the U/Pb method still
produced a wide range of dates for zircons from the same layer of ash.

Mattinson's idea was to first heat or anneal the zircons, sealing off
the least damaged areas of the crystal, then using a strong reagent,
hydrofluoric acid, to eat away the heavily damaged areas.

When Mundil used this treatment, the zircon dates were much more
consistent, requiring no selective interpretation of the data. The
calculated uncertainty is about a quarter of a million years, which
means the extinction took place over a very short time, the researchers
concluded.

The zircons were obtained from ash layers located in central and
southeastern China. The Meishan section in the latter region is accepted
as the type locality for the Permian/Triassic boundary.

Whereas the U/Pb method yields ages which are more accurate, "Ar/Ar is
still king in dating rocks younger than 100 million years and is about
as precise as U/Pb methods, though we need to get better data for the
decay constants to establish an absolute calibration," Renne said. "As
soon as that calibration is put in place, the Ar/Ar method could become
as accurate as U/Pb."

The work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the
Australian Research Council and the Ann and Gordon Getty Foundation.
Kenneth R. Ludwig of the BGC and Ian Metcalfe of the University of New
England in Armidale, Australia, also participated in the study.
Received on Mon 20 Sep 2004 01:30:33 PM PDT