[meteorite-list] Alleged Picture of "Meteorite PhotographedHittingEarth"
From: Chris Peterson <clp_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Nov 24 21:17:19 2004 Message-ID: <1a9901c4d294$e1350e80$f551040a_at_bellatrix> You're right. It would have been falling nearly vertically, subject only to some drift from the wind. If it had still been traveling at 30,000 mph as the article suggests, it would have been way bigger; a huge fireball, sonic booms, all sorts of stuff like that which would hardly have gone unnoticed. And a typical fall, which of course could have been captured on a camera, isn't going to produce an explosion when it hits. I guess the light bulb might have burst, creating something like an explosion. Still, there are just too many things about this story that are problematic. Chris ***************************************** Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Farmer" <meteoritehunter_at_comcast.net> To: "Paul H" <bristolia_at_yahoo.com>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 6:32 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Alleged Picture of "Meteorite PhotographedHittingEarth" > I think this is a load of crap, the piece is obviously very small, and > falling at a very low angle. There is no possible way a meteorite that small > could come down at that angle, it would have reached terminal velocity and > should be falling strait down. > Am I correct? > Mike Farmer Received on Wed 24 Nov 2004 09:17:03 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |