[meteorite-list] LL7 Chondrites
From: Jeff Grossman <jgrossman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:32:54 2004 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20040325184827.01bae708_at_gsvaresm05.er.usgs.gov> One of the reasons that type 7 ordinary chondrites are rare may be that many researchers do not think the distinction between 6 and 7 is significant and therefore never classify anything as type 7. As far as anymeteorite called type "6/7" is concerned, don't forget that the slash in a classification often means "I can't decide" and not "transitional". Certain classifiers use lots of slashes and others never use them at all. jeff At 04:30 PM 3/25/2004 -0700, Michael Farmer wrote: >Dr Ted Bunch did the classification. I have to belive that he knows what he >it doing. The pieces are up on my website right now. >See them here >http://www.meteoriteguy.com/nwa2092.htm >http://www.meteoriteguy.com/nwa20922.htm >Price is $30.00 gram today only. >Mike Farmer >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David Weir" <dgweir_at_earthlink.net> >To: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_comcast.net> >Cc: <bernd.pauli_at_paulinet.de>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> >Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:11 PM >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] LL7 Chondrites > > > > Hey Adam, > > > > Yes, I agree with you. Very perceptive. The two types are mutually > > exclusive based on the definition of Dodd. Type 7 ordinary chondrites > > were originally defined by Dodd et al. (1975) according to specific > > petrographic characteristics. They listed three metamorphic criteria to > > distinguish between petrographic types 6 and 7: > > > > 1.the presence of poorly defined chondrules in type 6, but only relict > > chondrules in type 7 > > > > 2.low-Ca pyroxenes in type 6 contain no more than 1.0 wt% CaO (1.0 wt% = > > ~1.9 mol% Wo), but more than 1.0 wt% in type 7; conversely, the CaO > > content of high-Ca pyroxenes decreases from type 6 to type 7 > > > > 3.feldspar grains gradually coarsen to reach a size of at least 0.1 mm > > in type 7 > > > > Perhaps this is one of those confused cases of classification in which > > different labs call things by different terminology. Could they have > > found both petrographic phases in the stone and used the slash to > > indicate this? Who did the classification? > > > > Regards, > > David > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > > >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184 US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383 954 National Center Reston, VA 20192, USA Received on Thu 25 Mar 2004 07:06:30 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |