[meteorite-list] LL6/7 New rare type for sale.
From: Thomas Webb <webbth1_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:32:53 2004 Message-ID: <20040325201331.8118.qmail_at_web60805.mail.yahoo.com> --0-974419503-1080245611=:7536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Michael, I read what Mike Jensen said as 4 from Antarctica. Go back and read the preceding sentence. Thomas Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_cox.net> wrote: Hi Mike, I am CONFUSED. You say in the second sentence below that there are 8 (eight) LL7s listed. Then, in the second to last sentence you say, "In fact, I could only find 4 LL7s...." Which is it????? Not trying to be a smart ass or confrontational.... just curious of the facts. Thanks, Michael on 3/25/04 7:34 AM, Mikestockj_at_aol.com at Mikestockj@aol.com wrote: > Hi Mike > I looked in our book A to Z and there are no LL6/7 transitional meteorites > listed. There are of course several LL6's listed and 8 LL7's...some of which > are > probably paired. In fact there are no LL6-7 or breccia types listed either. > There are all the other major transitional types including LL3/4, 4/5 and 5/6. > I also looked in the Antarctic meteorites and there are also none listed there > as well. In fact I could only find 4 LL7's listed though there could be some > newer ones. So it is definitely a new listing. Congratulations on the exciting > find/classification. > Mike ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. --0-974419503-1080245611=:7536 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii <DIV>Michael,</DIV> <DIV>I read what Mike Jensen said as 4 from Antarctica. Go back and read the preceding sentence.</DIV> <DIV>Thomas<BR><BR><B><I>Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_cox.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Hi Mike,<BR>I am CONFUSED. You say in the second sentence below that there<BR>are 8 (eight) LL7s listed.<BR>Then, in the second to last sentence you say, "In fact, I could only<BR>find 4 LL7s...." <BR>Which is it?????<BR>Not trying to be a smart ass or confrontational.... just curious of<BR>the facts.<BR>Thanks, Michael<BR><BR>on 3/25/04 7:34 AM, Mikestockj_at_aol.com at Mikestockj@aol.com wrote:<BR><BR>> Hi Mike<BR>> I looked in our book A to Z and there are no LL6/7 transitional meteorites<BR>> listed. There are of course several LL6's listed and 8 LL7's...some of which<BR>> are <BR>> probably paired. In fact there are no LL6-7 or breccia types listed either.<BR>> There are all the other major transitional types including LL3/4, 4/5 and 5/6.<BR>> I also looked in the Antarctic meteorites and there are also none listed there<BR>> as well. In fact I could only find 4 LL7's listed though there could be some<BR>> newer ones. So it is definitely a new listing. Congratulations on the exciting<BR>> find/classification.<BR>> Mike<BR><BR><BR><BR>______________________________________________<BR>Meteorite-list mailing list<BR>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com<BR>http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list</BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr size=1><font face=arial size=-1>Do you Yahoo!?<br> <a href="http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html"><b>Yahoo! Finance Tax Center</a></b> - File online. File on time. --0-974419503-1080245611=:7536-- Received on Thu 25 Mar 2004 03:13:31 PM PST |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|