[meteorite-list] Fw: NWA1836 (provisional)"The Twisted Sister"
From: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:31:28 2004 Message-ID: <012b01c3fc0b$77c5d700$7fc21018_at_attbi.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0128_01C3FBC8.670C5BC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Nels and List, The same scientist who originally studied NWA 1836 has already = determined that this material is definitely paired. As a matter of fact = he was on the expedition that produced the extra 334 grams which we = reported accurately. In case you forgot, Habbibi sent us a sample of = your stone before you even knew it existed. Nelson, you were aware = that what you had was only half a stone and that there was more weight, = yet you did not report it. TKW is important and this still does not = explain why only 220 grams was originally reported to the Nom Com. = Before you make statements about pairings you should check with the = University of Washington who studied a great deal of your inventory = before you were even aware it existed. =20 All the best, Adam and Greg Hupe IMCA 2185 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: nelson oakes=20 To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:36 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Fw: NWA1836 (provisional)"The Twisted = Sister" ----- Original Message -----=20 From: nelson oakes=20 To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 7:44 PM Subject: NWA1836 (provisional)"The Twisted Sister" Dear List, Originally I purchased a stone, obviously cut from a mass = supposedly a Eucrite. After depositing more than the required amount as = type sample the stone was analyzed by NAU and a prominent scientist = dubbed it the "Twisted Sister", due to the contortions and convolutions = within the stone, very unusual indeed. It is a stellar meteorite. The = weight given was the 505 plus grams that I purchased (and received) by = mail. Over a year later a package was delivered to me from a known = collector with the other portion of this single stone. This singularity = was obvious since the "halves" matched precisely. I immediately weighed = this new piece and reported the weights to NAU. The "newly obtained" = half was indeed the main mass and weighs 596.77 grams. TKW ca. 1100 = grams. Single stone. To my knowledge, and I've checked with a few = prominent scientists and they agree, there is NO STONE analyzed and = paired to "The Sister". There may be another Eucrite that looks somewhat = like it (after all it's a Eucrite!), but there's only one "Sister". = Thanks Nels ------=_NextPart_000_0128_01C3FBC8.670C5BC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dear Nels and List,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The same scientist who originally = studied NWA 1836=20 has already determined that this material is definitely paired. As = a=20 matter of fact he was on the expedition that produced the extra 334 = grams which=20 we reported accurately. In case you forgot, Habbibi sent us a = sample of=20 your stone before you even knew it existed. Nelson, you were = aware=20 that what you had was only half a stone and that there was more weight, = yet you=20 did not report it. TKW is important and this still does not = explain why=20 only 220 grams was originally reported to the Nom Com. Before you = make=20 statements about pairings you should check with the University of = Washington who=20 studied a great deal of your inventory before you were even aware = it=20 existed. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All the best,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Adam and Greg Hupe</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>IMCA 2185</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dpinwalla_at_epix.net href=3D"mailto:pinwalla@epix.net">nelson = oakes</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20 title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com">meteorite-list@meteor= itecentral.com</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, February 25, = 2004 5:36=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [meteorite-list] Fw: = NWA1836=20 (provisional)"The Twisted Sister"</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3Dpinwalla_at_epix.net href=3D"mailto:pinwalla@epix.net">nelson = oakes</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com">meteorite-list@meteor= itecentral.com</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, February 25, 2004 7:44 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> NWA1836 (provisional)"The Twisted = Sister"</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dear List, Originally I purchased a = stone,=20 obviously cut from a mass supposedly a Eucrite. After depositing more = than the=20 required amount as type sample the stone was analyzed by NAU and a = prominent=20 scientist dubbed it the "Twisted Sister", due to the contortions and=20 convolutions within the stone, very unusual indeed. It is a stellar = meteorite.=20 The weight given was the 505 plus grams that I purchased (and = received) by=20 mail. Over a year later a package was delivered to me from a known = collector=20 with the other portion of this single stone. This singularity was = obvious=20 since the "halves" matched precisely. I immediately weighed this new = piece=20 and reported the weights to NAU. The "newly obtained" half was = indeed the=20 main mass and weighs 596.77 grams. TKW ca. 1100 grams. Single stone. = To my=20 knowledge, and I've checked with a few prominent scientists and they = agree,=20 there is NO STONE analyzed and paired to "The Sister". There may be = another=20 Eucrite that looks somewhat like it (after all it's a Eucrite!), but = there's=20 only one "Sister". Thanks Nels</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0128_01C3FBC8.670C5BC0-- Received on Wed 25 Feb 2004 08:54:23 PM PST |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|