[meteorite-list] NPA 01-09-1970 Gehrke Links Moon Rocks, Allende Meteorite
From: MARK BOSTICK <thebigcollector_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Dec 17 11:00:12 2004 Message-ID: <BAY4-F3347EBDBD0D34A0F7E51CB3AF0_at_phx.gbl> Paper: Coshocton Tribune City: Coshocton, Ohio Date: Friday Evening, January 9, 1970 Page: 1 Gehrke Links Moon Rocks, Meteorite Research on the Apollo 11 moon rocks shows a striking similarity between the materials in the moon and in a meteorite that hit the earth recently. The research, done by a team of ag scientists from the University of Columbia, was revealed at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Apollo 11 reporting session in Houston Thursday. Following their analyses of moon rocks returned by the Apollo 11 astronauts, the UMC scientists led by Dr. Charles W. Gehrke, former resident of Coshocton, reported their findings to NASA officials. Dr. Cyril Ponnamperuma, director of the NASA Ames Laboratory, released the Missouri findings Thursday as part of the total report made in Houston. "The Missouri team found that the lunar samples returned from the Sea of Tranquility area of the moon and a large meteorite which fell near Pueblito de Allende in northern Mexico last February contain the same materials. The make-up is not just close, it is strikingly similar," Dr. Ponnamperuma told the Houston meeting this morning. "This finding opens vast new areas for speculation and will require further search and study to put it into proper scientific framework," Dr. Gehrke explained. The studies of Apollo 12 and 13 samples will make important contributions to this subject, he believes. Working with Dr. Gehrke were Dr. Walter Aue, Dr. David Stalling, Bob Zumwalt and Dr. Don Roach. All are present or recent staff members of the Agricultural Experiment Station Chemical Laboratories, of which Gehrke is director. The UMC team was called to the NASA Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., primarily to look for important life molecules in the moon rocks. Using methodology refined in the Experiment Station lab, this team could analyze the samples with a high degree of sensitivity and still not damage the molecules. These methods are not offered by any other research group. The Houston report confirmed that the UMC team did not find any of the so-called life molecules in the lunar samples, particularly the amino acids which are essentials of life as we know it. They did, however, find fragments and other pieces and parts of molecules which could conceivable be assembled into the beginnings of life in its most basic forms. "We found carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, hitrogen, silicon, and organo-silicon compounds," Dr. Gehrke explained. "Except for organo-silicon compounds, these are important in the make-up of life on this earth when they are combined and arranged in the ways that make the essential life building blocks." The UMC investigators told NASA officials that they did not find any indications of such life molecules having been assembled on the moon or clues that any such formation was likely to happen under moon conditions as we understand them. Given the right atmospheric conditions, however, life molecules would be a definite possibility. As a part of their analysis of the returned lunar samples, the UMC scientists compared them with various other materials. This is how the Pueblito de Allende meteorite was included in the analysis. Other samples studied included a piece of basalt from the Hawaiian Islands and quartz crystals estimated to be more than three billion years old - from the bottom of a gold mine in Africa. They showed none of the organic compounds which the scientists detected in the moon and meteorite samples. Extensive tests were conducted to eliminate all chances of coincidence influencing the findings and to make certain that the tests were valid in themselves. Analyses of the rocket exhaust from the lunar lander showed two points of similarity with the moon rocks and the meteorite. While it is possible that the moon rocks could have been contaminated by the exhaust, NASA officials point out "the possibility of contamination of the meteorite by rocket exhaust is extremely remote." On the basic of such double checking, it is believed that the findings are valid, Dr. Gehrke points out. Now it remains to determine their significance. The UMC team may help with that later on their month when they begin analysis of the Apollo 12 lunar samples returned from the moon's Sea of Storms area. No date has been set for the report of those studies. (end) Received on Fri 17 Dec 2004 10:59:40 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |