[meteorite-list] Cold hunting
From: joseph_town_at_att.net <joseph_town_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:29:53 2004 Message-ID: <20030911041126.EC07B538D3_at_pairlist.net> Gold Basin, Park Forest.... Unique situations, both. Rooting around the last pristine areas, the woods here....napalm is not an option. Bill Kieskowski > You could always burn the forest down and wait for the rain to wash the > black soot off the rocks to make the black crusted meteorites stand out > better. : ) > > PS. I am just kidding, please don't send any nasty replies. > > Thanks, Tom > Peregrineflier <>< > The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <joseph_town_at_att.net> > To: David Freeman <dfreeman_at_fascination.com> > Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 8:42 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Cold hunting > > > > When I'm out, especially in wooded areas where enough light is penetrating > > the canopy, I'm pretty much encouraged by the fact that I can see seeds in > > droppings and debris that have been around for a long time, years. An old > > soda bottle covered with moss still in situ on the forest floor indicates > to > > me that a 5 month old rock should be visible as well. Some forest floors > are > > hard as asphalt. Other areas are as soft as sponge due to moss coverage > and > > rebound pretty heavy projectile intrusion. I'm trying to develop a > strategy. > > Does anyone have any suggestions. The first leaves of fall will obscure > the > > floor soon. > > > > Bill > > > Dear List; > > > One more point, I recognized my 53.7 gram meteorite at about 40 feet > > > away, and could confirm it to be meteoritic at about 30 feet by the > > > excellent crust. I would have not seen it at all probably if I were in > > > a vehicle, or riding a four wheeler. > > > My method is walk ten steps, scan left to the comfortable sight range to > > > see a golf ball sized black item (about 100 feet in good light and clear > > > skies), look across in front of me in a long sweep of the eyes, and off > > > to the right the same distance. Ten more steps (about 30 feet for long > > > legged me) and do it again. Keep in mind, no rocks in my playa lake bed > > > but I am sorting through antelope droppings, sheep droppings, and horse > > > piles. The main plan is to discern the meteorites from the animal > > > droppings. Riding a four wheeler, or bicycle wouldn't work, as there had > > > been previous 4 wheeler tracks in a methodic pattern running back and > > > forth across the playa and about 100 foot swaths and they failed to find > > > the one, and I am pretty sure it was one of my student meteorite hunters > > > that missed the golden opportunity by traveling too fast. Attention to > > > detail was what helped me locate that fusion crust, and handling and > > > looking at maybe a hundred pounds of individual NWA's really imprinted > > > that fusion crust in my mind. That was important to me...that and > > > putting down that remote control, the mouse, and getting out to where > > > the meteorites should be found.Time spent in the field where the > > > meteorites live is the most important factor for my find. They don't > > > usually come through the roof. > > > Best, > > > DAve F. > > > > > > Matson, Robert wrote: > > > > > > >Hi Norm and List, > > > > > > > >>As an exploration geologist, I spend at least 15-20 long days every > > > >>month wandering the alluvial fans and dry lakes of Nevada searching > > > >>for mineralized float (and, unofficially, meteorites!). Some of > > > >>the remote dry lakes are almost certainly unsearched, and can cover > > > >>many square miles. > > > >> > > > > > > > >You might be surprised. Aside from playas on military installations > (which > > > >in Nevada is a pretty big fraction!) I'm fairly confident that most > > > >of the major dry lakes in Nevada (and California) have been searched at > > > >least once by one or more competent meteorite hunters. Of course, they > > > >haven't been searched "completely"; indeed, no location can ever be > > > >completely searched due to the dynamic nature of playas. > > > > > > > >>Putting along on my ATV, I can give a reasonably large area a pretty > > > >>decent search. After several years of this, still NO cold finds. > > > >> > > > > > > > >This is actually a bit surprising, though I can think of a couple > > > >factors which could bring it about: > > > > > > > >1. your size threshold (how small a stone you will stop for) > > > >2. too broad a search image > > > > > > > >By broad search image I mean that your primary target (mineralized > > > >float) is so dissimilar to your secondary target (meteorites) that > > > >the subconscious pattern-matching that your brain is trying to > > > >accomplish will suffer. (It's hard enough picking out meteorites > > > >among terrestrial brown and black rocks). > > > > > > > >>I think the point may be that there's a pretty good chance that > > > >>stones have at some point fallen on most any square mile of earth's > > > >>surface. > > > >> > > > > > > > >Absolutely. Even if each fall produced only a single meteorite, in > > > >any square mile you could expect a fall about once every 5000 > > > >years. However, the average number of meteorites per fall is > > > >certainly more than one (perhaps in the neighborhood of a half > > > >dozen?), so this improves things. Maybe a meteorite every 2500 > > > >years per square mile (a complex problem that requires some > > > >Monte Carlo modeling to come up with a good figure). This leads > > > >to Norm's next point: > > > > > > > >>However, in most areas, survival times are short. In many areas, > > > >>erosion has erased the record. In other areas, deposition has > > > >>buried every trace. > > > >> > > > > > > > >Exactly. I liked this wording: > > > > > > > >>From the cosmic perspective, every square mile is created equal, but > > > >>for us grunts on the ground, that's far from the case. Some square > > > >>miles are just right. Most are not. > > > >> > > > > > > > >If you want to reduce search time per (cold) meteorite find (i.e. > > > >non-strewnfield), the #1 factor is "survival time" -- you must > > > >maximize it any way you can: > > > > > > > >1. Low deposition rate -- ideally a ~negative~ deposition rate: you'd > > > >prefer a surface that is "deflating" > > > > > > > >2. Low annual precipitation > > > > > > > >3. Minimal human presence > > > > > > > >Fortunately point #3 tends to go naturally with #2. It's only in the > > > >modern era of weekend warriors (and meteorite hunters!) that #3 has > > > >become an issue. Still, the historical importance of point #3 can > > > >not be ignored for iron meteorites. Chondrites wouldn't have been > > > >particularly useful to native Americans 500 years ago; irons certainly > > > >were. > > > > > > > >But detection isn't just about "signal" (signal in this case being > > > >the presence of meteorites); it's about signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) > > > >and scan rate. What else is sharing space with your meteorites, > > > >and how does this impact the rate you can search an area? It's > > > >not much fun looking for meteorites in a sea of basalt. > > > > > > > >Scan rate, incidentally, is the reason one should never hunt cold for > > > >meteorites with a metal detector. It is more than 50 times less > > > >efficient that visual searching. But you also don't want your scan > > > >rate to be too high or you'll miss the small stuff. Remember that > > > >there are far greater numbers of small meteorites than large ones. > > > >Searching in a car or truck is fine for finding the big ones, but > > > >most places that ~can~ be searched by car/truck in Nevada and > > > >California already have been. You'll have better luck looking for > > > >small meteorites, and this means getting out of your car and its > > > >limited viewing angles. Most of my searching is done on foot. > > > > > > > >An ATV is even better than walking: you're still close to the ground > > > >with an unobstructed view, but you have the comfort and convenience > > > >of motorized transport. ATVs can also get into distant areas that > > > >cars can't (and by extension, walking searchers). > > > > > > > >So to summarize: search old, simple surfaces on foot or by ATV, > > > >and you will eventually find meteorites. > > > > > > > >Cheers, > > > >Rob > > > > > > > > > > > >______________________________________________ > > > >Meteorite-list mailing list > > > >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > > > >http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > Received on Thu 11 Sep 2003 12:11:23 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |