[meteorite-list] EBay analysis (preliminary)
From: Jamie Stephens <j.stephens_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:28:37 2004 Message-ID: <3FA1DDFC.2080204_at_morphism.com> John Gwilliam wrote: > I've been sitting back quietly watching this thread get over-baked over > the past few days and finally decided I'd step in a make a comment. > > In his remarks, Jamie talks about his potential "right" to publish data > that is extracted from publicly available documents. Personally, I > believe that with this "right" comes a lot of responsibility. I agree. Hence my 1. Soliciation for feedback and 2. My changes resulting from that feedback. > For example, did you know that if you've ever been a party in a divorce, > arrested and charged with a crime, or been to Tax Court, the written > records of those proceedings are public information? That is, unless > the judge in the case sealed the records, which is rarely done. That > means that I, or someone else, could access all court records involving > Meteorite List members throughout the United States and publish those > findings. Now wouldn't that be lovely? We'd know who the drunk drivers > and the wife beaters were and we could sit in our chairs and snicker > about all the nasty accusations that are part of every divorce trial. > No thanks, I don't need to see it...even if it is publicly available > information. I didn't think I was reporting on crimes. > You see, there is no beneficial value in doing so. Reporting on crimes? I dunno. Reporting aggregate data without names? Many folks -- including dealers -- think there's value. > Rather, it sounds like a good way to loose a bunch of friends to me. At least I think I lost Mike Groetz as friend. Other than that, I've had some great conversations (almost all off list) on the topic. > I don't see any real value to compiling information about Ebay sellers > and purchasers either. Sure, you can figure out what's been selling > well and what hasn't, and you can find out who has been spending the > most money on meteorites lately...so what? I think I agree with you here. The "Top N sellers" and "Top N buyers" were just a curiosity for me. I don't think there was much news. Anyway, actual names were of little benefit and clearly troublesome. Hence my statements about changing my ways. > Do you contact these buyers and offer to sell them more meteorites? No. As I mentioned in the first line of the note that started this thread, I haven't sold a single meteorite. Nor do I plan to. > I'm pretty sure that would be a violation of Ebay rules. > > How many list members are forty-hour-a-week "Meteorite Market Analists" > anyway? Probably 0. I spent two hours on this project -- and about six hours (and counting) with the subsequent email. > Someone else mentioned something about "getting a life." I vote for that. Thanks for the advice. --Jamie Received on Thu 30 Oct 2003 10:58:52 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |