[meteorite-list] Re: Taza an Glorieta Mountain Ni contents

From: Steve Schoner <steve_schoner_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:28:29 2004
Message-ID: <20031015171047.34855.qmail_at_web12706.mail.yahoo.com>

--0-810743855-1066237847=:30977
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Humm...
 
Did not look it up. I was not sure; relied on my sometimes defective memory, and for some reason I thought that Taza was 6 %. But if it is the other way around 16% plus, then the difference is still evident with the right testing. And I don't think an etch pattern will be the same.
 
Glorieta is as I read somewhere a tad under 10%... but that probably was from a small piece and variations can exist in this meteorite.
 
A high Ni content could explain why both meteorites still have fusion crust.
 
Anyway thanks for the correction.
 
Steve Schoner/ams
http://www.geocities.com/american_meteorite_survey


bernd.pauli_at_paulinet.de wrote:
Hi Steve,

> the Ni content for Glorieta is just a tad
> under 11% whereas as Taza is lower.

Not quite sure about this. Taza is described
as very rich in nickel (over 16%), whereas
you find 11.92 % Ni for Glorieta in Buchwald.

References:

BUCHWALD V.F. (1975) Handbook of
Iron Meteorites, Vol. 2, pp. 597-601.

BREY S. (2001) Taza (Meteorite, Nov. 2001,
Vol. 7, No. 4, p. 5).

Meteoritical Bulletin #86, 2002.


Best regards,

Bernd


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
--0-810743855-1066237847=:30977
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV>Humm...</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Did not look it up.&nbsp; I was not sure; relied on my sometimes defective memory, and&nbsp;for some reason I thought that Taza was 6 %.&nbsp; But if it is the other way around 16% plus, then the difference is still evident with the right testing.&nbsp;&nbsp; And I don't think an etch pattern will be the same.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Glorieta is as I read somewhere a tad under 10%... but that probably was from a small piece and variations can exist in this meteorite.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>A high Ni content could explain why both meteorites still have fusion crust.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Anyway thanks for the correction.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Steve Schoner/ams</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://www.geocities.com/american_meteorite_survey">http://www.geocities.com/american_meteorite_survey</A></DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>bernd.pauli_at_paulinet.de</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Hi Steve,<BR><BR>&gt; the Ni content for Glorieta is just a tad<BR>&gt; under 11% whereas as Taza is lower.<BR><BR>Not quite sure about this. Taza is described<BR>as very rich in nickel (over 16%), whereas<BR>you find 11.92 % Ni for Glorieta in Buchwald.<BR><BR>References:<BR><BR>BUCHWALD V.F. (1975) Handbook of<BR>Iron Meteorites, Vol. 2, pp. 597-601.<BR><BR>BREY S. (2001) Taza (Meteorite, Nov. 2001,<BR>Vol. 7, No. 4, p. 5).<BR><BR>Meteoritical Bulletin #86, 2002.<BR><BR><BR>Best regards,<BR><BR>Bernd<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=s%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%2Cslk%3Atext%2Csec%3Amail">The New Yahoo! Shopping</a> - with improved product search
--0-810743855-1066237847=:30977--
Received on Wed 15 Oct 2003 01:10:47 PM PDT


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb