[meteorite-list] Park Forest Main Mass Status

From: MeteorHntr_at_aol.com <MeteorHntr_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:34 2004
Message-ID: <90.36664d65.2be3e7e5_at_aol.com>

--part1_90.36664d65.2be3e7e5_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 5/2/03 10:14:09 AM Central Daylight Time,
adamhupe_at_attbi.com writes:


> What good would it do to
> map a strewn field if all the fragments where not taken into account that
> incidentally broke off when it hit an object?
>

Hupe and list,

I don't think "Main Mass" is a strewnfield term, rather a collection term.

Steve Arnold


--part1_90.36664d65.2be3e7e5_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2>In a message dated 5/2/03=
 10:14:09 AM Central Daylight Time, adamhupe_at_attbi.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-=
LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">What good would it do to
<BR>map a strewn field if all the fragments where not taken into account tha=
t
<BR>incidentally broke off when it hit an object?
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Hupe and list,
<BR>
<BR>I don't think "Main Mass" is a strewnfield term, rather a collection ter=
m.
<BR>
<BR>Steve Arnold
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_90.36664d65.2be3e7e5_boundary--
Received on Fri 02 May 2003 11:25:25 AM PDT


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb