[meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High
From: Rob Wesel <Nakhladog_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:21:06 2004 Message-ID: <007f01c34ca3$2d4e1ce0$629fe70c_at_GOLIATH> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C34C68.80088E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Evaporation possibly, but only if exposed during atmospheric re-entry. = An intact fuel vessel landing intact but then compromised by impact is a = whole different story. There is a large argument over the safety of = plutonium powered satelllites for just that reason. And there are known = levels of airborn plutonium produced by both fuel and weapon mishaps. I = am not necessarily subscibing to the complete text here but, = http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/1999/365/365p20.htm . -- Rob Wesel ------------------ We are the music makers...and we are the dreamers of the dreams. Willy Wonka, 1971 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: MARK BOSTICK=20 To: Tom aka James Knudson ; Marcia Swanson ; MrX3010_at_aol.com ; = Meteorite List=20 Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High Tom wrote: Hello Marcie, you asked; Do they rapidly cool after initial impact ? Also, why, in the case of the "Columbia" retrieval, were people warned not to touch fragments, = as they were hazardous? I think the reason was two fold, the one they gave, Hazardous fuel = from the tanks could of contaminated the pieces. Two, They wanted to scare the = people in an effort to keep them from taking pieces home! About the fall, the witness's claim to see have seen the=20 Hello Tom, Marcie, and List, I think I would be more to believe the second reason. Although one = could understand why NASA would make such a statement, its hard for me = to imagine that most of the fumes would not evaporate during its decent. Mark Bostick ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C34C68.80088E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2726.2500" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY=20 style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FONT: 10pt = verdana; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none"=20 bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Evaporation possibly, but only if exposed = during=20 atmospheric re-entry. An intact fuel vessel landing intact but then = compromised=20 by impact is a whole different story. There is a large argument over the = safety=20 of plutonium powered satelllites for just that reason. And there are = known=20 levels of airborn plutonium produced by both fuel and weapon = mishaps. I am=20 not necessarily subscibing to the complete text here but, <A=20 href=3D"http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/1999/365/365p20.htm">http://www.= greenleft.org.au/back/1999/365/365p20.htm</A> .<BR>--<BR>Rob=20 Wesel<BR>------------------<BR>We are the music makers...and we are the = dreamers=20 of the dreams.<BR>Willy Wonka, 1971</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dthebigcollector_at_msn.com = href=3D"mailto:thebigcollector_at_msn.com">MARK=20 BOSTICK</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dknudson911_at_frontiernet.net=20 href=3D"mailto:knudson911_at_frontiernet.net">Tom aka James Knudson</A> ; = <A=20 title=3DMJSOfArc_at_webtv.net href=3D"mailto:MJSOfArc@webtv.net">Marcia = Swanson</A> ;=20 <A title=3DMrX3010_at_aol.com = href=3D"mailto:MrX3010_at_aol.com">MrX3010@aol.com</A> ;=20 <A title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com">Meteorite List</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 17, 2003 = 11:50=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [meteorite-list] = Apparent=20 Meteorite Lands In Elma High</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Tom wrote:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Hello Marcie, you asked;<BR>Do they rapidly cool after initial = impact ?=20 Also, why, in the case of<BR>the "Columbia" retrieval, were people = warned not=20 to touch fragments, as<BR>they were hazardous?<BR><BR>I think the = reason was=20 two fold, the one they gave, Hazardous fuel from the<BR>tanks could of = contaminated the pieces. Two, They wanted to scare the people<BR>in an = effort=20 to keep them from taking pieces home!<BR>About the fall, the witness's = claim=20 to see have seen the </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Hello Tom, Marcie, and List,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I think I would be more to believe the second reason. = Although one=20 could understand why NASA would make such a statement, its hard for me = to=20 imagine that most of the fumes would not evaporate during its = decent.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Mark Bostick</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C34C68.80088E60--Received on Thu 17 Jul 2003 04:37:00 PM PDT |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|