[meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest
From: Michael Farmer <farmerm_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:21:01 2004 Message-ID: <02ea01c345cf$9b90a2c0$1830ef42_at_computer> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02E7_01C34594.EDE39FE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also, if the fall is SW to NE, and so far we see most small stones to = the south and south east of the large stones, would this not also be = affected by upper level winds? High winds can cause the smaller stones = to drift, meaning that this strewnfield would thus be perfectly normal.=20 Yes, strewnfields can be reversed, Portales Valley was a perfect = example, without exception, the largest stones all fell to the back and = the small stones fell later. This is due to low exploding of the = meteorite forcing the larger stones down.=20 Mike Farmer ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Thetoprok_at_aol.com=20 To: almitt_at_kconline.com=20 Cc: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:54 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide = Over Park Forest Hi Al, Yes I saw the the meteorwrongs in his collection too, it was a bit = disappointing, but he did not try very hard to convince me that they = were meteorites when I told him they were slag. I asked if he was = including them in his data and he said no. Is that really true? I don't = know.=20 He did have some nice individuals and fragments however, and claimed = his strewn field info came from real meteorites,some gathered by people = whose names I recognized.Some of the coordinates included a bunch that = were sold by the local Postmaster, who supposedly got most of his stones = from another man I met out there that was a local, and rather proficient = at finding the stones in the opening days of the fall. Even though Atul may not be completely reliable, the fact remains that = the larger stones are N.W. of the smaller ones, contradicting the = Satellite info.... unless of course there is such a thing as a reverse = fall! Adam, I never heard of that, is this like the April fools joke = about Venus? Please elaborate on this, I would like to know what falls = have a reverse distribution of material, that seems to defy the rules! = Mass and velocity, blah blah... you know, that physics stuff How can it = possibly be backward? Larry ------=_NextPart_000_02E7_01C34594.EDE39FE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Also, if the fall is SW to NE, and so = far we see=20 most small stones to the south and south east of the large stones, would = this=20 not also be affected by upper level winds? High winds can cause the = smaller=20 stones to drift, meaning that this strewnfield would thus be perfectly = normal.=20 </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Yes, strewnfields can be reversed, = Portales Valley=20 was a perfect example, without exception, the largest stones all fell to = the=20 back and the small stones fell later. This is due to low exploding of = the=20 meteorite forcing the larger stones down. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mike Farmer</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DThetoprok_at_aol.com=20 href=3D"mailto:Thetoprok_at_aol.com">Thetoprok@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dalmitt_at_kconline.com=20 href=3D"mailto:almitt_at_kconline.com">almitt@kconline.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A=20 title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com">meteorite-list@meteor= itecentral.com</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 08, 2003 = 8:54=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [meteorite-list] = DOD=20 Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT lang=3D0 = face=3DArial size=3D2=20 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"><BR>Hi Al,<BR>Yes I saw the the meteorwrongs in = his=20 collection too, it was a bit disappointing, but he did not try very = hard to=20 convince me that they were meteorites when I told him they were slag. = I asked=20 if he was including them in his data and he said no. Is that really = true? I=20 don't know. <BR>He did have some nice individuals and fragments = however, and=20 claimed his strewn field info came from real meteorites,some gathered = by=20 people whose names I recognized.Some of the coordinates included = a bunch=20 that were sold by the local Postmaster, who supposedly got most of his = stones=20 from another man I met out there that was a local, and rather = proficient at=20 finding the stones in the opening days of the fall.<BR>Even though = Atul may=20 not be completely reliable, the fact remains that the larger stones = are N.W.=20 of the smaller ones, contradicting the Satellite info.... unless of = course=20 there is such a thing as a reverse fall! Adam, I never heard of = that, is=20 this like the April fools joke about Venus? Please elaborate on this, = I would=20 like to know what falls have a reverse distribution of material, that = seems to=20 defy the rules! Mass and velocity, blah blah... you know, that physics = stuff=20 How can it possibly be=20 backward?<BR>Larry<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_02E7_01C34594.EDE39FE0-- Received on Wed 09 Jul 2003 12:07:24 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |