[meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest
From: Rob Wesel <Nakhladog_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:21:01 2004 Message-ID: <005d01c345cd$dc642a30$629fe70c_at_GOLIATH> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C34593.2F7435C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Glad to hear that, perhaps, I am not going insane!
--
Rob Wesel
------------------
We are the music makers...and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Adam Hupe=20
To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide =
Over Park Forest
Dear List Members,
It looks like some are starting to realize the secret of the Park =
Forest strewnfield, it is reversed. I think this has happened only a =
couple times in history. I hinted at this in a June 15th post to the =
list not wanting to take the element of surprise away from a person who =
is authoring a paper on this very subject.
All the best,
Adam
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Thetoprok_at_aol.com=20
To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 =
Bolide Over Park Forest
Hello Folks,
This whole thing has me a bit perplexed for several reasons. First, =
the stone my brother and I recovered had a distinct angle of entry that =
I saw and documented, and passed on to Mr. Sipiera. That trajectory =
definately indicated that the offending stone came in from the S.E. and =
was heading in a N.W. direction. I determined this before ever being =
subjected to other theoriesof direction of entry. I also spoke with =
eyewitnesses in the days that followed and all backed up that =
conclusion.
On a second trip I met with a man named Atul Kumar, He isn't a =
scientist but he has been gathering info on the strewn field for the =
astronomy club that he is involved with. He has compiled quite a =
list/map of stones that were recovered, including weights and locations =
of recovery, and his map indicates the same S.E. to N.W. direction, with =
the larger stones coming from the N.W. end of the strewn field.=20
Of course I can't argue with the DOD satellite observation, but it =
sure is contradictory to what I've been thinking all along! The =
satellite indicates an entry of exactly the opposite of what the strewn =
field maps look like that I have seen, and my own recoveries, 70 gram =
stone in Steger, 638gram stone in P.F. indicate at the very least a =
South to North trajectory, (roughly).
No matter how you slice it, based on the DOD satellite info, the =
larger stones should be south of the small ones, and this is just not =
the case.
Is human error possible, between interpretation of the satellite =
data and publication of said information?
Curious minds want to know,
Larry=20
------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C34593.2F7435C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2726.2500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Glad to hear that, perhaps, I am not =
going=20
insane!<BR>--<BR>Rob Wesel<BR>------------------<BR>We are the music=20
makers...and we are the dreamers of the dreams.<BR>Willy Wonka,=20
1971</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dadamhupe_at_comcast.net =
href=3D"mailto:adamhupe_at_comcast.net">Adam Hupe</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com">meteorite-list@meteor=
itecentral.com</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 08, 2003 =
8:17=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [meteorite-list] =
DOD=20
Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dear List Members,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It looks like some are starting to =
realize the=20
secret of the Park Forest strewnfield, it is reversed. I think =
this has=20
happened only a couple times in history. I hinted at this in a =
June 15th=20
post to the list not wanting to take the element of surprise away from =
a=20
person who is authoring a paper on this very subject.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All the best,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Adam</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3DThetoprok_at_aol.com=20
href=3D"mailto:Thetoprok_at_aol.com">Thetoprok@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com">meteorite-list@meteor=
itecentral.com</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 08, 2003 =
8:01=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [meteorite-list] =
DOD=20
Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT lang=3D0 =
face=3DArial size=3D2=20
FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"><BR><BR>Hello Folks,<BR><BR>This whole thing =
has me a bit=20
perplexed for several reasons. First, the stone my brother and I =
recovered=20
had a distinct angle of entry that I saw and documented, and passed =
on to=20
Mr. Sipiera. That trajectory definately indicated that the offending =
stone=20
came in from the S.E. and was heading in a N.W. direction. I =
determined this=20
before ever being subjected to other theoriesof direction of entry. =
I also=20
spoke with eyewitnesses in the days that followed and all backed up =
that=20
conclusion.<BR>On a second trip I met with a man named Atul Kumar, =
He isn't=20
a scientist but he has been gathering info on the strewn field for =
the=20
astronomy club that he is involved with. He has compiled quite a =
list/map of=20
stones that were recovered, including weights and locations of =
recovery, and=20
his map indicates the same S.E. to N.W. direction, with the larger =
stones=20
coming from the N.W. end of the strewn field. <BR>Of course I can't =
argue=20
with the DOD satellite observation, but it sure is contradictory to =
what=20
I've been thinking all along! The satellite indicates an entry of =
exactly=20
the opposite of what the strewn field maps look like that I have =
seen, and=20
my own recoveries, 70 gram stone in Steger, 638gram stone in P.F. =
indicate=20
at the very least a South to North trajectory, (roughly).<BR>No =
matter how=20
you slice it, based on the DOD satellite info, the larger stones =
should be=20
south of the small ones, and this is just not the case.<BR>Is human =
error=20
possible, between interpretation of the satellite data and =
publication of=20
said information?<BR>Curious minds want to know,<BR>Larry</FONT>=20
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C34593.2F7435C0--
Received on Tue 08 Jul 2003 11:54:55 PM PDT
|
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|