[meteorite-list] OT? NASA & Radioactive Risks

From: tracy latimer <daistiho_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:18:29 2004
Message-ID: <F85QeSOzNCWbzwWJv3z00001454_at_hotmail.com>

Regarding the risks from "radioactive debris" as a result of a spacecraft
explosion, I believe that what the article is talking about are the ceramic
fuel cells that power electrical systems on board. These fuel cells DO
contain plutonium, but it has been vitrified and generates power through
heat of decay. These cells are almost indestructible, and if damaged,
fragment into discrete chunks that may be recovered, and even if not
recovered, pose little danger. A rocket of this type once failed, the fuel
cell was recovered from the debris, and on inspection, was found to have
been undamaged and was later reused. This is the same type of cell used to
power CASSINI.

Tracy Latimer




>From: geoking_at_notkin.net
>To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: [meteorite-list] OT? NASA & Radioactive Risks
>Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:36:30 -0500
>
>Dear Listees:
>
>The following article is excepted from London's "Independent." The full
>story (dealing initially with "Columbia" wreckage retrieval) can be found
>here:
>
>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=376682
>
>In light of all the NASA and "Columbia"-related posts we have been reading,
>I thought this might be of interest to many, especially since an accident
>with one of these rockets carrying radioactive material could produce,
>perhaps, the most destructive meteorite in recent times -- a lump of
>plutonium-238 plummeting back to Earth?
>
>A "one-in-30 chance" of a launch accident doesn't sound too reassuring.
>Don't get me wrong -- I'm very pro-space program -- but it's worrying to
>discover that risky nuclear propulsion is still in use and even, it seems,
>gaining favor.
>
>Any thoughts, Ron?
>
>Regards,
>
>Geoff N.
>www.paleozoic.org
>
>
>***********
>
>
>Nasa has said that all manned spaceflights will be suspended until it can
>get to the bottom of the Columbia disaster and correct the fatal problem.
>Concerns about the safety of travel through the earth's atmosphere do not,
>however, appear to have derailed Nasa plans to launch two unmanned rockets
>loaded with plutonium in the next few months.
>
>The Independent on Sunday has learned that Nasa has rejected pleas to
>suspend missions involving radioactive material, even though its own
>assessments reveal that the rockets are three times more likely to have an
>accident than the shuttle.
>
>The two Mars explorer rockets, scheduled for launch from Cape Canaveral on
>30 May and 25 June, will each contain small amounts of plutonium-238, which
>in the event of a launch failure could put tens of thousands of people at
>risk from radioactive fallout. Each probe will carry Radioisotope Heater
>Units (RHUs) containing 2.7 grams of the deadly isotope.
>
>Nasa's own environmental impact statement acknowledges that there is a
>one-in-30 chance of a launch accident and a one-in-230 chance of an
>accidental release of radioactive material for each rocket. The accident
>rate for the shuttle was calculated at one per 100 launches.
>
>The proposed use of nuclear materials has not generated significant debate
>in the US because media attention has been focused squarely on the Columbia
>investigation. For the past two days, television stations have shown and
>reshown military surveillance photographs from a base in New Mexico
>indicating a slight bulge in Columbia's left wing and a plume emanating
>from behind it. The head of the US shuttle program, Ron Dittemore, told
>reporters the photographs were certainly of interest but added: "All by
>itself I don't think it's very revealing."
>
>The nuclear issue is nevertheless at the forefront of Nasa's thinking and
>endorsed at the highest levels of government. The Mars explorer rockets are
>to be followed by two further launches of deep space probes containing
>plutonium-238: the Pluto New Horizons project in 2008 and Mars Smart Lander
>the next year. Each are being designed to carry Radioisotope Thermoelectric
>Generators which use heat from plutonium to generate electricity.
>
>President Bush, meanwhile, has revived plans for nuclear-powered rockets
>which were abandoned in the 1960s amid warnings that they could cause a
>global environmental catastrophe. Nasa proposals for a $2bn research and
>development grant for the nuclear spacecraft were confirmed by the White
>House last Monday, just two days after the shuttle disaster, although there
>has yet to be a formal announcement..
>
>The $3bn programme, codenamed Project Prometheus - after the figure who
>stole fire from Zeus - is designed to be a 75,000mph rocket, which could
>put men on Mars. While the projects' initial objectives are ostensibly for
>scientific exploration, much of the impetus for funding comes from the
>Pentagon, which wants to launch weapons into space as part of its revived
>Star Wars initiative.
>
>The push for nuclear power in space follows President Bush's appointment of
>Sean O'Keefe, an ardently pro-nuclear former defence chief, as head of
>Nasa. He has likened conventional rockets, which can reach 18,000 mph, to
>"exploring the old west in covered wagons." Shortly before the Columbia
>crash he said: "We're talking about doing something on a very aggressive
>schedule to not only develop the capabilities for nuclear propulsion and
>power generation but to have a mission using the new technology within this
>decade."
>
>The last major accident involving radioactive material in space was in
>1967, when a US satellite fitted with a nuclear-powered electrical
>generator failed to achieve orbit and burned up in the atmosphere,
>spreading radioactive fallout widely over Earth.
>
>
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Received on Fri 21 Feb 2003 05:26:14 PM PST