[meteorite-list] Mystery Meteorite Contest II

From: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:18:27 2004
Message-ID: <00c901c2d466$afd7bfa0$ba06e70c_at_attbi.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2D423.A12E38A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear List Members and contest participants,

First of all, I would like to thank everybody for their patience. The =
classifications were supposed to be announced in Tucson. This was =
overlooked at the very successful Blood auction because of the hectic =
pace. Michael did not get out of there until after 1:00 am and did a =
remarkable job of managing hundreds of details.

This contest was designed to test visual identification skills. Nobody =
guessed all three correctly but we will still award all of the specimens =
to different entrants. The reason I used the word "guess" is because =
that is all one can do in the field. I was wrong myself on the first =
two so do not feel bad if you did not get the answers correct. This =
exercise demonstrates the importance of laboratory confirmation. I have =
seen several people make pairing decisions on appearance alone. This is =
not a good practice because several rarities can be overlooked. We =
would have missed a rare polymict diogenite if we did not insist that =
every achondritic stone be tested.

Without further delay here are the classifications and winners:

1) NWA 1646 Cumulate Eucrite Breccia
    This was the most confusing of the lot with guesses ranging from =
Lunar to Mercury.
    Nobody guessed this one correctly so we drew a name from a hat.=20
    Congratulations to Mark Fox

2) NWA 1647 Shocked Basaltic Eucrite (monomict)
    Most people guessed an Aubrite which was my first impression, as =
well.
    Congratulations to Martin Horejsi who was the first to guess this =
one.

3) NWA 1650 Polymict Eucrite Breccia
    This one had the most correct responses. A lot of entrants guessed =
a Howardite.
    Congratulations to Mike Tettenborn who was the first to get this one =
correct.=20

This shows the diversity of Eucrites which can range greatly in =
appearance. None of these samples look even remotely alike, yet they =
all fall into the Eucrite class. With close to 40 entrants this was a =
fun contest. We were impressed with the number of List Members willing =
to step up to the plate and compete in a very difficult contest. We =
hope this was educational and justified the bandwidth taken from =
Meteorite Central.

If you are a winner please send us an email with your mailing address so =
that we can distribute these specimens.


Wishing everybody the very best,

Adam and Greg Hupe
The Hupe Collection
IMCA 2185




------=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2D423.A12E38A0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dear List Members and contest=20
participants,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>First of all, I would like to thank =
everybody for=20
their patience.&nbsp; The classifications were supposed to be announced =
in=20
Tucson.&nbsp; This was overlooked at the very successful Blood auction =
because=20
of the hectic pace.&nbsp; Michael did not get out of there until after =
1:00 am=20
and did a remarkable job of managing hundreds of details.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This contest was designed to =
test&nbsp;visual=20
identification skills.&nbsp; Nobody guessed all three correctly but we =
will=20
still award all of the specimens to different entrants.&nbsp; The reason =
I used=20
the word "guess" is because that is all one can do in the field.&nbsp; I =
was=20
wrong myself on the first two so do not feel bad if you did not get the =
answers=20
correct.&nbsp; This exercise demonstrates the importance of laboratory=20
confirmation.&nbsp; I have seen several people make pairing decisions on =

appearance alone.&nbsp; This is not a good practice because several =
rarities can=20
be overlooked.&nbsp; We would have missed a rare polymict diogenite if =
we did=20
not insist that every achondritic stone be tested.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Without further delay here are the =
classifications=20
and winners:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1) NWA 1646 Cumulate Eucrite =
Breccia</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This was the most =
confusing of=20
the lot with guesses ranging from Lunar to Mercury.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nobody guessed this =
one=20
correctly so we drew a name from a hat.&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Congratulations to =
Mark=20
Fox</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>2) NWA 1647 Shocked Basaltic Eucrite=20
(monomict)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Most people =
guessed an=20
Aubrite which was my first impression, as well.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Congratulations to =
Martin=20
Horejsi who was the first to guess this one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>3) NWA 1650 Polymict Eucrite =
Breccia</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This =
one&nbsp;had the most=20
correct responses.&nbsp;&nbsp;A lot of entrants guessed a=20
Howardite.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Congratulations to =
Mike=20
Tettenborn who was the first to get this one correct.&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This shows the diversity of Eucrites =
which can=20
range greatly in appearance.&nbsp; None of these samples look even =
remotely=20
alike, yet they all fall into the Eucrite class.&nbsp;&nbsp; With close =
to 40=20
entrants this was a fun contest.&nbsp;We were impressed with the number=20
of&nbsp;List Members willing to step up to the plate and compete in a =
very=20
difficult contest.&nbsp; We hope this&nbsp;was educational and justified =
the=20
bandwidth taken from Meteorite Central.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If you are a winner please send us an =
email with=20
your mailing address so that we can distribute these =
specimens.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Wishing everybody the very =
best,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Adam and Greg Hupe</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The Hupe Collection</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>IMCA 2185</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2D423.A12E38A0--
Received on Fri 14 Feb 2003 03:21:41 PM PST


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb