[meteorite-list] x-Boötis (Quadrantids) Meteor Shower
From: MexicoDoug_at_aol.com <MexicoDoug_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:18:02 2004 Message-ID: <1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_at_aol.com> --part1_1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ron, =A1=A1 Boo !! as in as in Bootes (formerly somewhat known as Quadrans=20 Muralis), not to pronounce like the "oo" of booties. The latest news on the= =20 Quadrantids' meteor shower radiating from Bootes. Sounds like there may hav= e been=20 some major booty shaking and perhaps disintegration of the parent body 2003=20= EH=20 1. I can't resist asking if anyone can correlate any Jan 3 or (Jan 4?) fall= s,=20 or there about. This should be a fresh research question. Anne from=20 Impactika.com has listed the following falls for that date: Jan 2 (none) Jan 3 1877 Warrenton 1903 St. Mark's=20 1970 Lost City Jan 4, 5 (none) Saludos Doug Dawn Mexico http://leonid.arc.nasa.gov/IAUCircular2003Dec8.txt 2003 EH_1 AND THE QUADRANTIDS P. Jenniskens, NASA Ames Research Center, has pointed out that 2003 EH_1 (cf. MPEC 2003-E27) would seem to be a very strong candidate for the parent of the Quadrantid meteor stream. The later orbits, from arcs of up to 48 days (MPO 48330), indicate that frequent approaches within 0.2-0.3 AU of Jupiter occur, those during the past century or two evidently increasing q from just under 1 AU (with other orbital elements also very similar to those of the Quadrantids) to the present 1.19 AU. The current theoretical radiant for 2003 EH_1 (R.A. =3D 229.9 deg, Decl. =3D +49.6 deg; V_inf =3D 41.7 km/s at solar longitude 282.94 deg, equinox 2000.0) is at the center of the Quadrantid radiants measured by photographic means, the narrow dispersion implying a young (about 500 years) shower age. From that dispersion, Jenniskens et al. (1997, Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1242) suspected that the parent was still among the meteoroids, hiding as a minor planet. On computing a parabolic orbit for C/1490 Y1, Hasegawa (1979, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 31, 257) introduced that comet as the likely Quadrantid parent. In attempting to link the 2003 observations to those of 1490-1491, Jenniskens, and also B. G. Marsden (Center for Astrophysics), have found that most of the potential solutions with the required Jan. 1491 perihelion date yield 0.5 < q < 0.6 AU in 1491, and this is probably too small to fit the data used by Hasegawa. Values in the more acceptable range of 0.7 < q < 0.8 AU (and 0.80 > e > 0.75) certainly arise for 1488 < T < 1494, however, the desired date being clearly attainable with the help also of a close approach to the earth or -- more likely -- the presence of nongravitational forces. Further light could be shed on the problem by the recognition of precovery and/or recovery observations of 2003 EH_1, which is presumably a comet and that should in any case be considered a high-priority object for further study. (C) Copyright 2003 CBAT 2003 December 8 (8252) Daniel W. E. Green --part1_1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY= =3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">Ron, =A1=A1 Boo !! as in as in Boot= es (formerly somewhat known as Quadrans Muralis), not to pronounce like the=20= "oo" of booties. The latest news on the Quadrantids' meteor shower rad= iating from Bootes. Sounds like there may have been some major booty s= haking and perhaps disintegration of the parent body 2003 EH 1. I can'= t resist asking if anyone can correlate any Jan 3 or (Jan 4?) falls, or ther= e about. This should be a fresh research question. Anne from Imp= actika.com has listed the following falls for that date:<BR> <B><BR> Jan 2 (none)<BR> <BR> Jan 3<BR> 1877</B> Warrenton<BR> <B>1903</B> St. Mark's <BR> <B>1970</B> Lost City<BR> <BR> <B>Jan 4, 5 (none)<BR> <BR> </B>Saludos<BR> Doug Dawn<BR> Mexico<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> http://leonid.arc.nasa.gov/IAUCircular2003Dec8.txt<BR> <BR> <BR> 2003 EH_1 AND THE QUADRANTIDS<BR> P. Jenniskens, NASA Ames Research Center, has point= ed out that<BR> 2003 EH_1 (cf. MPEC 2003-E27) would seem to be a very strong<BR> candidate for the parent of the Quadrantid meteor stream. The<BR> later orbits, from arcs of up to 48 days (MPO 48330), indicate that<BR> frequent approaches within 0.2-0.3 AU of Jupiter occur, those<BR> during the past century or two evidently increasing q from just<BR> under 1 AU (with other orbital elements also very similar to those<BR> of the Quadrantids) to the present 1.19 AU. The current<BR> theoretical radiant for 2003 EH_1 (R.A. =3D 229.9 deg, Decl. =3D +49.6<BR> deg; V_inf =3D 41.7 km/s at solar longitude 282.94 deg, equinox<BR> 2000.0) is at the center of the Quadrantid radiants measured by<BR> photographic means, the narrow dispersion implying a young (about<BR> 500 years) shower age. From that dispersion, Jenniskens et al.<BR> (1997, Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1242) suspected that the parent was<BR> still among the meteoroids, hiding as a minor planet. On computing<BR> a parabolic orbit for C/1490 Y1, Hasegawa (1979, Publ. Astron. Soc.<BR> Japan 31, 257) introduced that comet as the likely Quadrantid<BR> parent. In attempting to link the 2003 observations to those of<BR> 1490-1491, Jenniskens, and also B. G. Marsden (Center for<BR> Astrophysics), have found that most of the potential solutions with<BR> the required Jan. 1491 perihelion date yield 0.5 < q < 0.6 AU in<BR> 1491, and this is probably too small to fit the data used by<BR> Hasegawa. Values in the more acceptable range of 0.7 < q < 0.8 A= U<BR> (and 0.80 > e > 0.75) certainly arise for 1488 < T < 1494, howev= er,<BR> the desired date being clearly attainable with the help also of a<BR> close approach to the earth or -- more likely -- the presence of<BR> nongravitational forces. Further light could be shed on the<BR> problem by the recognition of precovery and/or recovery<BR> observations of 2003 EH_1, which is presumably a comet and that<BR> should in any case be considered a high-priority object for further<BR> study.<BR> <BR> &nbs= p; (C) Copyright 2003 CBAT<B= R> 2003 December 8 &= nbsp; (8252) &nbs= p; Daniel W. E. Green<BR> </FONT></HTML> --part1_1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_boundary-- Received on Sun 21 Dec 2003 09:41:11 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |