[meteorite-list] x-Boötis (Quadrantids) Meteor Shower

From: MexicoDoug_at_aol.com <MexicoDoug_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:18:02 2004
Message-ID: <1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_at_aol.com>

--part1_1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ron, =A1=A1 Boo !! as in as in Bootes (formerly somewhat known as Quadrans=20
Muralis), not to pronounce like the "oo" of booties. The latest news on the=
=20
Quadrantids' meteor shower radiating from Bootes. Sounds like there may hav=
e been=20
some major booty shaking and perhaps disintegration of the parent body 2003=20=
EH=20
1. I can't resist asking if anyone can correlate any Jan 3 or (Jan 4?) fall=
s,=20
or there about. This should be a fresh research question. Anne from=20
Impactika.com has listed the following falls for that date:

Jan 2 (none)

Jan 3
1877 Warrenton
1903 St. Mark's=20
1970 Lost City

Jan 4, 5 (none)

Saludos
Doug Dawn
Mexico




http://leonid.arc.nasa.gov/IAUCircular2003Dec8.txt


2003 EH_1 AND THE QUADRANTIDS
     P. Jenniskens, NASA Ames Research Center, has pointed out that
2003 EH_1 (cf. MPEC 2003-E27) would seem to be a very strong
candidate for the parent of the Quadrantid meteor stream. The
later orbits, from arcs of up to 48 days (MPO 48330), indicate that
frequent approaches within 0.2-0.3 AU of Jupiter occur, those
during the past century or two evidently increasing q from just
under 1 AU (with other orbital elements also very similar to those
of the Quadrantids) to the present 1.19 AU. The current
theoretical radiant for 2003 EH_1 (R.A. =3D 229.9 deg, Decl. =3D +49.6
deg; V_inf =3D 41.7 km/s at solar longitude 282.94 deg, equinox
2000.0) is at the center of the Quadrantid radiants measured by
photographic means, the narrow dispersion implying a young (about
500 years) shower age. From that dispersion, Jenniskens et al.
(1997, Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1242) suspected that the parent was
still among the meteoroids, hiding as a minor planet. On computing
a parabolic orbit for C/1490 Y1, Hasegawa (1979, Publ. Astron. Soc.
Japan 31, 257) introduced that comet as the likely Quadrantid
parent. In attempting to link the 2003 observations to those of
1490-1491, Jenniskens, and also B. G. Marsden (Center for
Astrophysics), have found that most of the potential solutions with
the required Jan. 1491 perihelion date yield 0.5 < q < 0.6 AU in
1491, and this is probably too small to fit the data used by
Hasegawa. Values in the more acceptable range of 0.7 < q < 0.8 AU
(and 0.80 > e > 0.75) certainly arise for 1488 < T < 1494, however,
the desired date being clearly attainable with the help also of a
close approach to the earth or -- more likely -- the presence of
nongravitational forces. Further light could be shed on the
problem by the recognition of precovery and/or recovery
observations of 2003 EH_1, which is presumably a comet and that
should in any case be considered a high-priority object for further
study.

                      (C) Copyright 2003 CBAT
2003 December 8 (8252) Daniel W. E. Green

--part1_1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY=
=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">Ron, =A1=A1 Boo !! as in as in Boot=
es (formerly somewhat known as Quadrans Muralis), not to pronounce like the=20=
"oo" of booties.&nbsp; The latest news on the Quadrantids' meteor shower rad=
iating from Bootes.&nbsp; Sounds like there may have been some major booty s=
haking and perhaps disintegration of the parent body 2003 EH 1.&nbsp; I can'=
t resist asking if anyone can correlate any Jan 3 or (Jan 4?) falls, or ther=
e about.&nbsp; This should be a fresh research question.&nbsp; Anne from Imp=
actika.com has listed the following falls for that date:<BR>
<B><BR>
Jan 2 (none)<BR>
<BR>
Jan 3<BR>
1877</B> Warrenton<BR>
<B>1903</B> St. Mark's <BR>
<B>1970</B> Lost City<BR>
<BR>
<B>Jan 4, 5 (none)<BR>
<BR>
</B>Saludos<BR>
Doug Dawn<BR>
Mexico<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
http://leonid.arc.nasa.gov/IAUCircular2003Dec8.txt<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
2003 EH_1 AND THE QUADRANTIDS<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; P. Jenniskens, NASA Ames Research Center, has point=
ed out that<BR>
2003 EH_1 (cf. MPEC 2003-E27) would seem to be a very strong<BR>
candidate for the parent of the Quadrantid meteor stream.&nbsp; The<BR>
later orbits, from arcs of up to 48 days (MPO 48330), indicate that<BR>
frequent approaches within 0.2-0.3 AU of Jupiter occur, those<BR>
during the past century or two evidently increasing q from just<BR>
under 1 AU (with other orbital elements also very similar to those<BR>
of the Quadrantids) to the present 1.19 AU.&nbsp; The current<BR>
theoretical radiant for 2003 EH_1 (R.A. =3D 229.9 deg, Decl. =3D +49.6<BR>
deg; V_inf =3D 41.7 km/s at solar longitude 282.94 deg, equinox<BR>
2000.0) is at the center of the Quadrantid radiants measured by<BR>
photographic means, the narrow dispersion implying a young (about<BR>
500 years) shower age.&nbsp; From that dispersion, Jenniskens et al.<BR>
(1997, Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1242) suspected that the parent was<BR>
still among the meteoroids, hiding as a minor planet.&nbsp; On computing<BR>
a parabolic orbit for C/1490 Y1, Hasegawa (1979, Publ. Astron. Soc.<BR>
Japan 31, 257) introduced that comet as the likely Quadrantid<BR>
parent.&nbsp; In attempting to link the 2003 observations to those of<BR>
1490-1491, Jenniskens, and also B. G. Marsden (Center for<BR>
Astrophysics), have found that most of the potential solutions with<BR>
the required Jan. 1491 perihelion date yield 0.5 &lt; q &lt; 0.6 AU in<BR>
1491, and this is probably too small to fit the data used by<BR>
Hasegawa.&nbsp; Values in the more acceptable range of 0.7 &lt; q &lt; 0.8 A=
U<BR>
(and 0.80 &gt; e &gt; 0.75) certainly arise for 1488 &lt; T &lt; 1494, howev=
er,<BR>
the desired date being clearly attainable with the help also of a<BR>
close approach to the earth or -- more likely -- the presence of<BR>
nongravitational forces.&nbsp; Further light could be shed on the<BR>
problem by the recognition of precovery and/or recovery<BR>
observations of 2003 EH_1, which is presumably a comet and that<BR>
should in any case be considered a high-priority object for further<BR>
study.<BR>
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (C) Copyright 2003 CBAT<B=
R>
2003 December 8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (8252)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Daniel W. E. Green<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_1e7.160d4df1.2d17b3c7_boundary--
Received on Sun 21 Dec 2003 09:41:11 PM PST


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb