[meteorite-list] Meteorite Collecting Ban

From: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:16:31 2004
Message-ID: <029201c35e00$64dcaaa0$b4dbe60c_at_attbi.com>

Dear Sergey and List,

 I wish I had the time to manage just such a database but this would
represent a full-time effort. I think Bernd could tweak his data base to
extrapolate some of this data. Maybe if we are nice he will do such a
thing. My opinion is that the desert has been easily outperforming
Antarctica the last two years and will continue to do so just as long as the
laws remain favorable.

All the best,

Adam


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergey Vasiliev" <svassiliev_at_iol.cz>
To: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>;
<meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Collecting Ban


> Dear List and Adam,
>
> I do not have my copy of MetBase 6.0 yet so it is difficult
> for me to compare the latest SNCs numbers but... ;-)
>
> What about somebody who have a time and knowledge (Adam?) will make a
> mathematic
> formula to compare hot/cold deserts finds?
>
> Something like that:
>
> Deserts Finds:
>
> QOF = ((n * t)/S) * LUCK * EXPIRIENSE
>
> QOF = Quantity Of Finds
> n = quantity of nomads or other meteorite hunters or scientists involved
in
> prospecting for meteorites
> t = average time of one nomad (hunter, scientist) searching for meteorites
> S = area in square km
> LUCK - I don't know the math for that yet ;-)
> EXPIRIENSE - All I know about this parameter is that it is going better
time
> wise
>
> Sure you can add some parameters for moving ice in Antarctica to enlarge
the
> "S".
> But... you have to accept that penguins were witness of the falls (too bad
> we can't
> understand it yet)
>
> Anyway: (Non-Antarctic MINUS witness falls) in compare for the deserts.
>
> Sergey
>
>
>
>
> > Dear List,
> >
> > It is interesting to note that the Non-Antarctic to Antarctic ratio is
> > different when it comes to planetary material.
> >
> > SNCs
> > Qty Non-Antarctic Qty Antarctic
> > 18 10
> >
> > Lunar
> > Qty Non-Antarctic Qty Antarctic
> > 15 12
> >
> >
> > This ratio is also starting to favor other rare material. The desert is
> > proving to be bountiful for new study material.
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Fri 08 Aug 2003 06:57:07 PM PDT