[meteorite-list] Mystery
From: SSachs9056_at_aol.com <SSachs9056_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:07:05 2004 Message-ID: <16.279a1040.2af1ea42_at_aol.com> Hi Michael and List, I'm not sure if this will help you or not. The photograph portion of the software I use (PhotoStudio 2000) for my meteorite website gave me the option of scanning photographs anywhere from a 75dpi resolution to 2400dpi resolution. I initially scanned the photos at about 600dpi. Little did I realize until I tried opening the website that it took many minutes for all of the pics to display. Needless to say at 600dpi, the images took up a tremendous amount of real estate. I re-scanned all of the pics again at 75dpi, and there was really no discernible difference in picture quality. The pics loaded up at least 6-7 times as fast, the website was much quicker to display...all was right with the world. Now, I don't a thing about digital cameras but I would surmise that if the cameras allowed the operator to determine the dpi / resolution, a lower resolution might work as long as it does not affect the image quality. Anyone else with a thought on this? My two dpi worth... ;-) Steven L. Sachs Received on Wed 30 Oct 2002 09:06:58 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |