[meteorite-list] How To Collect Meteorites
From: almitt <almitt_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:07:02 2004 Message-ID: <3DB2F6B4.570A2652_at_kconline.com> Hello all, Don't know if this subject has come up before (probably has) but thought I would try to start a thread that might be useful to all the collectors out there on how you might collect. Don't want to suggest that I have all the answers on how different people collect or even how one should collect but thought this might be fun (the reason for this topic so others can chime in and offer their suggestions). I think ideally the perfect specimen one would like to have in a collection, is an individual (single stone or iron complete without blemishes) that is, a text book example of a meteorite or a true museum piece. Unfortunately we can't all owe the best examples as they are far and few between the average specimen. I often see items listed as a museum piece or orientated but I don't think they always are what they are represented as or one persons opinion might differ with others on this definition. A thumb printed, orientated piece might just be the center piece of a collection if you are able to acquire one at all. There are many buyers for the best specimens as a rule and would normally command a higher asking price. There are many specimens that are less than perfect but in no means inferior to the perfect pieces that we would all desire. Some of these are no doubt unique and very much worth keeping in our collections and are true gems by themselves. In my collection (and in no way am I saying this is the only way to collect) I try to have an example of both the individual stone or iron and slice if possible. Sometimes I only have a slice (individuals are too costly or hard to get sometimes) or only an individual and I am needing a slice or part slice. This shows both what a piece looked like after the fall and what the interior looks like inside (without disturbing a nice individual). I have had a slice or an individual for years before the complementary piece is finally obtained!! If one can't collect an individual then a half specimen is always nice (and would be my second choice) as it shows the outside structure of a fall along with a nice window of the interior and can be displayed in many ways. End pieces would be my third choice over an individual or individual that is nearly perfect (beauty is always in the eye of the beholder, right?). Even if you can't get a true half of an end piece then any end piece is still a good choice as it still shows much of the look of your meteorite while providing a window to the interior. 1/4 end pieces would also be a good choice when possible and if that is to ones liking. Full slices would be my next choice if an individual, or end piece isn't available. This allows for the outside edge to be seen and what the crust is like. It also shows what the interior looks like on both sides of the slice and offers two different ways to present the piece in a collection or while on display. Full slices also show what the individual meteorite looked like in shape at the point the slice was taken from. Some pieces only a small slice is really needed for the representative type, but in other cases in order to show a good structure of the class type meteorite (like a coarsest octahedrite structure) a larger slice may be needed. Again not everyone would want to collect a larger size slice (space restrictions, costs, preference) all enters into the decision on what is in a collection. A half slice would be my next choice as it shows good representation of the meteorite, the outside crust if any and a good view to the interior. It also can be display on both sides to show the interior off. After that part slices WITH crust would always be a first choice but in the case of a hard to obtain type (or in some cases where there is more interior than outside crust), a part slice even small ones are always better than no slice at all. After that part slices with no crust are always better than no representative type. Macro specimens (larger than a micro mount) would be a good choice and then a micro mounted specimen after that. The larger the specimen the more scientifically valuable it is. (I do not want this to get into a size debate!!!) Ideally if I can't afford a reasonable size specimen, then I save up for it or trade for it, when possible. I have found if you are patient sooner or later a specimen will come around again, even the hard to obtain. If a hard to obtain type becomes available then it is always a good idea to buy it if it is a have to have piece. Being patient though on pieces that are more readily available has more often been a good rule of thumb for me over the past years. Finding out total known weight of a fall or find is important when considering your purchase and often is why a specimen is or isn't readily available. There are some falls or finds that sell rapidly because of their beauty and type, even if there is a fair quantity so this is part of the decision making process. Ownership of a fall or a find can restrict the material availability and drive up price if someone is setting on a wanted fall or find. Next message with deal with types of collections. I hope others will put their two grams worth in and offer tips that I have left out. All my best! --AL Received on Sun 20 Oct 2002 02:32:21 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |