[meteorite-list] Your opinion, please...

From: John Gwilliam <jkgdiver_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:02:30 2004
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20020319104937.00987ba0_at_pop.primenet.com>

--=====================_2525305==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

The fact that she says it is slightly magnetic rules out the possibility of
it containing an appreciable amount of iron.

My guess is hematite or magnitite. A streak test would tell which one it is.

John



At 01:02 PM 3/19/02 -0500, magellon_at_earthlink.net wrote:
>An eBayer saw my meteorwrong page and asked my opinion of the following.
>I discreetly bow to those more experienced: ( the last two picts are
>small, sorry)
> <http://www.bay-town.com/members/magellon/misc/aussi1.jpg>Top
> <http://www.bay-town.com/members/magellon/misc/aussi2.jpg>Bottom
> <http://www.bay-town.com/members/magellon/misc/aussi3.jpg>Side
>
>Here is her story,
>"I picked this up in country New South Wales in a National Park Wilderness
>area. It is unlike any surrounding rocks or any that I have seen in that
>district. I have done quite a bit of fossicking for sapphires & rubies and
>seen nothing like this. The area is mostly volcanic basalt overlying
>granidiorite and some granitic areas. This may be terrestrial iron, but if
>so, it perhaps may have become airborne from the volcano?, as it is
>oriented and has a rollover lip. It is heavier than other rocks of similar
>size, but not considerably so, (125 gms), and it is slightly magnetic, but
>not considerably so. Size is 2.5" x 1.5" x 1". Incidentally, there is no
>industry within several hundred kilometres, and no railway line, so it
>would not be smelter ore or slag."
>
>I will pass on to her you expert observations.
>Thanks,
>Ken Newton
>#9632

John Gwilliam Meteorites
PO Box 26854
Tempe AZ 85285
http://www.meteoriteimpact.com
--=====================_2525305==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
The fact that she says it is slightly magnetic rules out the possibility
of it containing an appreciable amount of iron.<br>
<br>
My guess is hematite or magnitite.&nbsp; A streak test would tell which
one it is.<br>
<br>
John<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
At 01:02 PM 3/19/02 -0500, magellon_at_earthlink.net wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>An eBayer saw my meteorwrong page and asked my
opinion of the following. <br>
I discreetly bow to those more experienced: ( the last two picts are
small, sorry) <br>
&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bay-town.com/members/magellon/misc/aussi1.jpg">Top</a>
<br>
&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bay-town.com/members/magellon/misc/aussi2.jpg">Bottom</a>
<br>
&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bay-town.com/members/magellon/misc/aussi3.jpg">Side</a>
<br>
<br>
Here is her story, <br>
&quot;I picked this up in country New South Wales in a National Park
Wilderness area. It is unlike any surrounding rocks or any that I have
seen in that district. I have done quite a bit of fossicking for
sapphires &amp; rubies and seen nothing like this. The area is mostly
volcanic basalt overlying granidiorite and some granitic areas. This may
be terrestrial iron, but if so, it perhaps may have become airborne from
the volcano?, as it is oriented and has a rollover lip. It is heavier
than other rocks of similar size, but not considerably so, (125 gms), and
it is slightly magnetic, but not considerably so. Size is 2.5&quot; x
1.5&quot; x 1&quot;. Incidentally, there is no industry within several
hundred kilometres, and no railway line, so it would not be smelter ore
or slag.&quot; <br>
<br>
I will pass on to her you expert observations. <br>
Thanks, <br>
Ken Newton <br>
#9632 </blockquote><br>
<div>John Gwilliam Meteorites</div>
<div>PO Box 26854</div>
<div>Tempe&nbsp; AZ&nbsp; 85285</div>
<a href="http://www.meteoriteimpact.com/" EUDORA=AUTOURL>http://www.meteoriteimpact.com</a>
</html>

--=====================_2525305==_.ALT--
Received on Tue 19 Mar 2002 12:52:42 PM PST


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb