[meteorite-list] Insurer's Scientists Ponder The Threat Of Meteor Disaster
From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:02:28 2004 Message-ID: <200203141716.JAA20199_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov> http://www.ctnow.com/business/hc-meteorite0314.artmar14.story?coll=hc%2Dheadlines%2Dbusiness Space Bombardment Not So Far-Fetched? Insurer's Scientists Ponder The Threat Of Meteor Disaster By DIANE LEVICK, The Hartford Courant March 14, 2002 Insurers are thinking about the unthinkable in the wake of Sept. 11 - and not just terrorism. Now they're being urged to consider the financial threat posed by a "bombardment from space." No, not from space aliens, but from meteorites and "space rubbish" such as old satellites, rocket stages and space station waste. The insurance industry has underestimated the meteorite risk and could be on the hook for much of the damage from a hit to the Earth because policies don't exclude it, said a report Wednesday by scientists at Munich Re, the world's largest reinsurer. The stern warning, however, isn't expected to lead U.S. insurers to rewrite policies to exclude such coverage or raise rates specifically for meteorite risk. A meteor is believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs tens of millions of years ago, and about 100 meteorite crashes on Earth were documented between 1900 and 2001. One in 1908 in Siberia felled or damaged trees in an area as large as Berlin, Moscow and London combined, the report noted. So the risk isn't just fodder for films such as "Deep Impact," which slightly missed the mark by toppling the World Trade Center with a comet-driven sea wave. With estimates for Sept. 11 claims ranging anywhere from $30 billion to $70 billion, Munich Re warned in its report on natural catastrophes that insurers need to rethink the potential for future losses. As a reinsurer, Munich Re assumes some of the risk and premiums from insurance companies and takes a hit in many disasters. The probability of a meteorite strike is very low, but "if a densely populated area were directly hit by a meteorite or by a sea wave after a meteorite crash, this could result in a loss accumulation of previously unknown dimensions," Munich Re said. A "bombardment from space" could mean massive destruction due to pressure and shock waves, heat waves, fire, tsunamis and climate changes, the company noted. The industry must consider whether it's equipped to deal with such a disaster, "which is to be doubted," the report concluded. U.S. property-casualty insurers do realize a meteorite crash could be "potentially very very devastating," but "I don't believe this is a front burner issue for the industry at this time," said Robert P. Hartwig, vice president and chief economist for the Insurance Information Institute in New York. "It may be one of those issues that requires an event to occur before the [risk] is explicitly priced in," Hartwig said. The Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. said Wednesday that it recognizes meteorite crashes are a serious branch of study but "frankly meteorites and meteorite exclusions are just not on our radar these days." The Hartford and other insurers are more concerned about getting Congress to create a federal backstop for future terrorism claims. Hartwig points out the futility of worrying about insurance if there's another meteorite strike of the dinosaur-extinction level. "Whether your insurance claim will be paid is the least of your concerns," Hartwig said. "Being vaporized is your first concern." Received on Thu 14 Mar 2002 12:16:18 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |