[meteorite-list] Sulfide-slag
From: David Freeman <dfreeman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:01:30 2004 Message-ID: <3CFD6626.5000108_at_fascination.com> Dear Robert and List; I have always marveled at the educational value of a good meteorwrong and posts such as Robert's Sulfide-slag are just magnificent sluthing. My favorite meteorwrong currently is the 20 pound basalt chunk found near a volcanic area that this feller' hauls down to Denver and other places, hoping that it is a lunar basalt....mights well go big guns! Thanks for a real educational post Robert! More, More! Best, Dave Freeman Robert Verish wrote: >I apologize for this Off-Topic subject, but I would >like to take this opportunity to personally thank Troy >Bell, for his efforts in trying to determine the >origin of a particular type of meteor-wrong that is >commonly seen on eBay. Troy found his first specimen >in the gravel of a parking lot near where he lives in >Texas. When Troy told me that the gravel was a >typical "slag", I told him to try and find more of >this LBR (Little Black Rock) and to take some samples >of the slag gravel. He found 2 more "little black >rocks", which he sent to me, along with samples of the >slag gravel. > >My examination confirmed that the LBRs and the slag >have a common origin. In addition, these LBRs are >made from the same material that I have encountered >numerous times from people wanting their "meteorites" >identified. And I'm sure many on this List have >encountered this, as well. Lately, a third of the >meteor-wrongs that I have encountered are of this >"sulfide-rich" material. Although there appears to be >various sources for this material, I have always >contended that this was waste material from an ore >smelting process [slag]. But now, Troy's observant >eye has found the "smoking gun" evidence that confirms >that this material is a slag. > >This confirmation also raises the concern that some of >these LBRs could have elevated concentrations of >arsenic and lead. > >The following images show a cut surface of this >material. Because of the above concern, BE ADVISED - >to never DRY cut or grind this material, and to treat >the cuttings and coolant with caution. > >Image #1: ><http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/troybell.jpg> > >The interior "looks like" a natural sulfide mineral >with a highly specular, metallic luster. But it is >not a metal. Mostly crystalline with needle-shaped >laths (an atypical crystal habit for sulfides). The >exterior has a patina. Having been exposed to the >forces of weathering, and over time, the sulfide-rich >rock has formed a black tarnish. > >Image #2: ><http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/tbell-cu.jpg> > >Close-up of the cut surface. Locally vesicular; >cavities will show cleavage for these synthetic >(man-made) crystals. There are some inclusions of >melted silicates. > >As mentioned earlier, this kind of meteor-wrong has >long been seen on eBay, but typically being auctioned >as "Arizona ?? Meteorite"!! >I couldn't find any current "meteorite" auction like >this, but this "mineral" auction looks like the same >kind of material, but without the black tarnish: > ><http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2108278605> > >Now that it has been identified, my curiosity about >this material has been satisfied, and I will now move >on to the next "mystery rock" (hopefully, it will be a >real meteorite;-). But in the meanwhile, it may prove >beneficial (since this stuff is so widespread) to have >this "identified" material on a meteor-wrong web page >in order to educate future meteor-wrong sellers. > >Bob V. > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > Received on Tue 04 Jun 2002 09:15:18 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |