[meteorite-list] Neuschwanstein meteorite

From: Mark Fox <unclefireballmtf_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:00:12 2004
Message-ID: <20020730201101.16687.qmail_at_web14911.mail.yahoo.com>

July 30, 2002

Greetings Mr. Marco Langbroek!

Although you are no doubt more knowledgeable than I
am, wouldn't it be conceivable that if Pribram and
Neuschwanstein do belong to a meteoroid stream, that
the dynamics and formation of it would be quite
different than from what we are used to?

Long strewn fields!

Mark Fox
Newaygo, MI USA


--- Marco Langbroek <marco.langbroek_at_wanadoo.nl>
wrote:
> This will give the CRE guys headaches. If
> Neuschwanstein is a stream with
> the Pribram meteorite (and it really seems to be):
> then how come that
> Pribram has a CRE age of 19 +- 2 Ma as recently
> refined (see Lindner en
> Welten, Radiant (j. DMS) 24:2 (2002))? That is way
> too much for an intact
> stream.
>
> - Marco Langbroek
>
>
> ---
> Marco Langbroek private:
> marco.langbroek_at_wanadoo.nl
> Leiden University work:
> m.langbroek_at_arch.leidenuniv.nl
> Faculty of Archaeology
> P.O. Box 9515
> http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/
> NL-2300 RA Leiden
> The Netherlands
>
> "What seest thou else
> In the dark backward and abysm of time?"
>
> William Shakespeare: The Tempest act I scene 2
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
Received on Tue 30 Jul 2002 04:11:01 PM PDT