[meteorite-list] Question about nickel [nickel-poor iron meteorites]
From: Rodrigo Martinez <benig_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:00:06 2004 Message-ID: <000901c227c8$7aeba040$331807c8_at_oemcomputer> Hola Piper and list Piper, Thank you for the information about nickel, this is very complete and well reference. I tell you news about the Bellsbank group ( Bellsbank, La Primitiva, Tombigbee River and Twannberg ) now these formed a new iron group IIG due to a new discovery in the Atacama Desert. This new meteorite called Guanaco is the fifth member of this group and was analyzed by John Wasson (UCLA). This information is in www.meteorites.cl/science.html Thank you. Best Regards Rodrigo Martinez Atacama Desert Meteorites benig_at_entelchile.net http://www.meteorites.cl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Piper R.W. Hollier" <piper_at_xs4all.nl> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>; "Rodrigo Martinez" <benig_at_entelchile.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:19 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Question about nickel [nickel-poor iron meteorites] > Hello Rodrigo and list, > > Vagn Buchwald's "Handbook of Iron Meteorites" (1976) has a rather detailed > discussion of nickel content on pages 76-77 with several histograms showing > the frequency distribution of percentage nickel content. He states, "In > iron meteorites, nickel varies from a minimum of 5.1-5.3% (Tombigbee River, > Auburn, Holland's Store) to a maximum of 35% (Santa Catharina). If > Oktibbeha County, page 947, is confirmed as an independent meteorite, the > nickel maximum increases to about 60%." > > In Buchwald's histograms, the most nickel-poor iron group, the IIA > hexahedrites, show a bell-shaped distribution which drops off very sharply > below 5.3%. Of course, Buchwald's data set is now 26 years old and > meteoritic science has not stood still in the years since his masterpiece > was published. Still, the only irons which I am aware of with nickel > content below the 5.1% lower bound which Buchwald claims are the so-called > Bellsbank trio, which includes Bellsbank, La Primitiva, and Tombigbee > River. These are classified as chemically and structurally anomalous (UNGR) > but appear to be related to the IIAB irons. A nickel content of 4.3% was > determined for Tombigbee River in 1973, a fact which Buchwald was > apparently unaware of at the time his Handbook was published. A paper > published in 1984 by Malvin, Zong, and Wasson presents a hypothesis for a > process which may have allowed the Bellsbank trio to form under very > exceptional circumstances in isolated pockets of phosphorus-rich melt in > the IIAB core, with their anomalous composition as a result. This paper is > available online at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html (search > for "Bellsbank"). > > All things considered, it seems much more likely that an iron specimen with > nickel content below around 4% is manmade rather than a representative of > an as yet undiscovered group of iron meteorites. Buchwald points out that > nickel is extremely siderophile ("iron loving"), even more so than iron > itself. Processes of fractionation in the metal phase allow for a rather > wide range of iron/nickel ratios, but the laws of physical chemistry seem > to draw the line at around 4% as a lower bound. > > Best wishes to all, > > Piper > > Standard disclaimer: I am not now and have never been a professional > meteoriticist or geochemist, and any personal opinions not supported by > references to authorities more qualified than myself should be taken with > the usual grain of salt. > > > Received on Wed 10 Jul 2002 12:13:49 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |