[meteorite-list] Hot Desert Meteorites
From: Greg Redfern <gredfern_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:54:05 2004 Message-ID: <NBBBJPGEPBMHMOJGKPFFGEALCEAA.gredfern_at_earthlink.net> Amen, Bernd! I am very new to collecting meteorites but have loved them since my very earliest days - a walk to the bottom of Meteor Crater and a passion for astronomy will do that to you. It is as I said to Mark Miconi recently, how incredible it is to own and touch a piece of the Universe. I am sure that all list members would love to travel beyond our planet's atmosphere - but never, ever will. So, the very best next thing is to bring a piece of another world into your own home and hold it in your hands. Couple that with the ability to actually SEE the world it came from through a telescope and "now your talkin'!" Hold a piece of NWA 482 and then look at the Moon - no doubt as to where it came from. Look at an HST shot of Mars and then look at DAG 476 - "it ain't from this planet, that's for sure". Peer at the celestial dot that is Vesta and then look at a AEUC from Australia - how alien but also how beautiful. It's beyond my wildest dreams to be able to do so. Last thought. Commercialization of these items is the only reason why we are able to own them. Our passion, scientific inquiries, and careful possession of these celestial treasures is what gives them meaning. I know that we will never lose sight of that. Warmest Regards Fellow List Members, Greg Redfern IMCA #5781 -----Original Message----- From: meteorite-list-admin_at_meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-admin_at_meteoritecentral.com]On Behalf Of Bernd Pauli HD Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:02 AM To: LABENNE METEORITES Cc: dean bessey; meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com Subject: [meteorite-list] Hot Desert Meteorites Luc a écrit: > ... and about the NWA, those returned recently from Marocco > say that the quantity they saw in not so bigger that before. Bonjour Luc, Hello List, I was just reading Christian Pinter's article about the 2001 Mineral and Gem Show in Munic in Meteorite, Feb 2002, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 38-39, when your post arrived here. There are three remarks in Christian's article that I would like to share with all of us: 1. Bruno: "But today there is only one tenth of what had been found in Morocco two years ago." 2. Ahmed Pani: "There is really less material coming from the Sahara now." 3. Erich Haiderer: "There is still enough out there for decades to come." > For me there are not good or bad meteorites, there are well documented or > poorly documented meteorites, well preserved or weathered meteorites, nice > or bad looking meteorites and scientifically important or not meteorites, with > all the intermediate states. I absolutely agree with the above words! Very often conversations about our love for meteorites oscillate between how exotic, common, or historical they are, and, on the other hand we complain (!) about the decreasing prices and monetary values of our Hot Desert meteorites. One list member wrote to me in a private mail that prices for historical falls like - say, Juvinas, Steinbach, etc. - will never decrease as much as the prices for those classified or unclassified NWAs. Again our views are shifting towards the financial investigation and away from our enthusiasm for those "heavenly messengers". A lunar is a lunar, a Martian is a Martian. I for my part collect meteorites because I love them, not because I want to investigate and make profits - after all I am not a dealer but a collector. When we started collecting these asteroidal "crumbs" many years ago, we said: "Oh, if I only had a eucrite in my collection!" Now some of us will say: "A eucrite would be OK ... what? It's a NWA! ... and there are no coordinates, no total weight, ... ah, well I think I had better buy a Stannern eucrite. Thus I won't lose my money! And now a quick glance at Stannern in my database: Stannern: brecciated; monomict; noncumulate And, as a comparison, one of those Hot Desert meteorites: Sahara 98110: brecciated; monomict Any difference? OK, I know the Sahara 98110 does have coordinates which the Labennes will disclose at a later time, but do coordinates make a eucrite a eucrite? A scientifical approach to this problem would be different (see my post re: "NWA meteorites blessing or omen? / Wed, 13 Feb 2002) but, again, I am not a meteoriticist, I am a collector! Best wishes, Bernd ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Sat 16 Feb 2002 09:41:30 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |