[meteorite-list] (That is the fact, JACK!)

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

From: LITIG8NSHARK_at_aol.com <LITIG8NSHARK_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:53:36 2004
Message-ID: <7a.33d33fa0.2b351bca_at_aol.com>

--part1_7a.33d33fa0.2b351bca_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 12/20/2002 3:36:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,
catmountainman_at_yahoo.com writes:

The KILABO meteorite and the HADEJIA meteorite are two different meteorites.
The HADEJIA was classified in new mexico, and the KILABO was classified here
in chicago. That is the fact, JACK!

Steve r. Arnold, Chicago, il, 60107The midwest meteorite collector!I.M.C.A.
member #6728Website url <A HREF="http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com">http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com</A> (resized to
conserve bandwidth)

Can anyone say "Cocky"? Dare, anyone say "obnoxious"?

OK, so Steve thinks he has the meteorite acquisition of the Millennium. So
be it. Is that any reason to be rude to other list members who, possessing
far superior knowledge and standing in the meteorite community, suggest that
perhaps due to the changing of meteorite names as a meteorite goes through
the classification process that Steve is possibly mistaken?

Is it not possible that multiple samples of any given meteorite are tested
contemporaneously in different laboratories?

Enough said.

Best Regards to all of you,

Paul Martyn

--part1_7a.33d33fa0.2b351bca_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR="#80ffff">In a message dated 12/20/2002 3:36:44 PM Pacific Standard Time, catmountainman_at_yahoo.com writes: 
 
The KILABO meteorite and the HADEJIA meteorite are two different meteorites. The HADEJIA was classified in new mexico, and the KILABO was classified here in chicago. That is the fact, JACK! 
 
Steve r. Arnold, Chicago, il, 60107The midwest meteorite collector!I.M.C.A. member #6728Website url <A HREF="http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com">http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com</A>      (resized to conserve bandwidth) 
 
 
Can anyone say "Cocky"?  Dare, anyone say "obnoxious"? 
 
OK, so Steve thinks he has the meteorite acquisition of the Millennium.  So be it.  Is that any reason to be rude to other list members who, possessing far superior knowledge and standing in the meteorite community, suggest that perhaps due to the changing of meteorite names as a meteorite goes through the classification process that Steve is possibly mistaken?  
 
Is it not possible that multiple samples of any given meteorite are tested contemporaneously in different laboratories? 
 
Enough said. 
 
Best Regards to all of you, 
 
Paul Martyn 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
</HTML>
--part1_7a.33d33fa0.2b351bca_boundary--
Received on Fri 20 Dec 2002 08:20:10 PM PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Eric Twelker: "[meteorite-list] (no subject)Hadejia"
Previous message: John Gwilliam: "[meteorite-list] Simple tektite test"
Next in thread: M come Meteorite Meteorites: "[meteorite-list] (That is the fact, JACK!)"
Reply: M come Meteorite Meteorites: "[meteorite-list] (That is the fact, JACK!)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

StumbleUpon

del.icio.us

Yahoo MyWeb