[meteorite-list] A different slant.
From: Michael Casper <Michael_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:49:01 2004 Message-ID: <001301c14065$ea167760$0200a8c0_at_Domain> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C14044.62A7C340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A different slant. > Subject: FW: From someone who grew up in Afghanistan >=20 >=20 >=20 > > Dear Colleagues, > >=20 > > As we reflect upon the tragic events of this week and an appropriate = > > "response," I thought you might like to see this letter from my=20 > > college roommate, Tamim Ansary, who grew up in Afghanistan. I think = > > he offers an interesting perspective on Bin Laden, the Taliban, and=20 > > Afghanistan. > >=20 > > Toivo Kallas > > Department of Biology & Microbiology > >=20 > > >Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:14:27 -0700 > > > > > >Dear Friends,=20 > > > > > >Yesterday I heard a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to=20 > > >the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio allowed that this=20 > > >would mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do=20 > > >with this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral = > > >damage," and he asked, "What else can we do? What is your=20 > > >suggestion?" Minutes later I heard a TV pundit discussing whether=20 > > >we "have the belly to do what must be done." > > > > > >And I thought about these issues especially hard because I am from=20 > > >Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've = never=20 > > >lost track of what's been going on over there. So I want to share a = > > >few thoughts with anyone who will listen. > > > > > >I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is=20 > > >no doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the=20 > > >atrocity in New York. I fervently wish to see those monsters=20 > > >punished. > > > > > >But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not = even=20 > > >the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant=20 > > >psychotics who captured Afghanistan in 1997 and have been holding=20 > > >the country in bondage ever since. Bin Laden is a political = criminal=20 > > >with a master plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you=20 > > >think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when you think "the people of=20 > > >Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the concentration camps." It's = not=20 > > >only that the Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity.=20 > > >They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They would love = for=20 > > >someone to eliminate the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of=20 > > >international thugs holed up in their country. I guarantee it. > > > > > >Some say, if that's the case, why don't the Afghans rise up and=20 > > >overthrow the Taliban themselves? The answer is, they're starved,=20 > > >exhausted, damaged, and incapacitated. A few years ago, the United = > > >Nations estimated that there are 500,000 disabled orphans in=20 > > >Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. Millions of=20 > > >Afghans are widows of the approximately two million men killed=20 > > >during the war with the Soviets. And the Taliban has been = executing=20 > > >these women for being women and have buried some of their opponents = > > >alive in mass graves. The soil of Afghanistan is littered with = land=20 > > >mines and almost all the farms have been destroyed . The Afghan=20 > > >people have tried to overthrow the Taliban. They haven't been able=20 > > >to. > > > > > >We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the = Stone=20 > > >Age. Trouble with that scheme is, it's already been done. The=20 > > >Soviets took care of it . Make the Afghans suffer? They're already = > > >suffering. Level their houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles=20 > > >of rubble? Done. Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy their=20 > > >infrastructure? There is no infrastructure. Cut them off from=20 > > >medicine and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that. > > > > > >New bombs would only land in the rubble of earlier bombs. Would=20 > > >they at least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan,=20 > > >only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around.=20 > > >They'd slip away and hide. (They have already, I hear.) Maybe >=20 > > >the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they don't move = > > >too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul=20 > > >and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the = criminals=20 > > >who did this horrific thing. Actually it would be making common=20 > > >cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people they've = been=20 > > >raping all this time > > > > > >So what else can be done, then? Let me now speak with true fear and = > > >trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with=20 > > >ground troops. I think that when people speak of "having the belly=20 > > >to do what needs to be done" many of them are thinking in terms of=20 > > >having the belly to kill as many as needed. They are thinking = about=20 > > >overcoming moral qualms about killing innocent people. But it's the = > > >belly to die not kill that's actually on the table. Americans will = > > >die in a land war to get Bin Laden. And not just because some=20 > > >Americans would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin=20 > > >Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than that, folks. To get any=20 > > >troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they = > > >let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be = first.=20 > > >Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going.=20 > > >The invasion approach is a flirtation with global war between Islam = > > >and the West. > > > > > >And that is Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants and=20 > > >why he did this thing. Read his speeches and statements. It's all=20 > > >right there. AT the moment, of course, "Islam" as such does not=20 > > >exist. There are Muslims and there are Muslim countries, but no = such=20 > > >political entity as Islam. Bin Laden believes that if he can get a = > > >war started, he can constitute this entity and he'd be running it.=20 > > >He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem=20 > > >ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam=20 > > >and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the West wreaks a=20 > > >holocaust in Muslim lands, that's a billion people with nothing = left=20 > > >to lose, even better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably = > > >wrong about winning, in the end the west would probably=20 > > >overcome--whatever that would mean in such a war; but the war would = > > >last for years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours. = Who=20 > > >has the belly for that? Bin Laden yes, but anyone else? > > > > > >I don't have a solution. But I do believe that suffering and = poverty=20 > > >are the soil in which terrorism grows. Bin Laden and his cohorts=20 > > >want to bait us into creating more such soil, so they and their = kind=20 > > >can flourish. We can't let him do that. That's my humble opinion. > > > > > >Tamim Ansary >=20 >=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C14044.62A7C340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A different = slant.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>>=20 Subject: FW: From someone who grew up in Afghanistan<BR>> = <BR>>=20 <BR>> <BR>> > Dear Colleagues,<BR>> > <BR>> > As we = reflect=20 upon the tragic events of this week and an appropriate <BR>> > = "response,"=20 I thought you might like to see this letter from my <BR>> > = college=20 roommate, Tamim Ansary, who grew up in Afghanistan. I think = <BR>> >=20 he offers an interesting perspective on Bin Laden, the Taliban, and = <BR>>=20 > Afghanistan.<BR>> > <BR>> > Toivo Kallas<BR>> >=20 Department of Biology & Microbiology<BR>> > <BR>> > = >Date:=20 Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:14:27 -0700<BR>> > ><BR>> > >Dear = Friends,=20 <BR>> > ><BR>> > >Yesterday I heard a lot of talk = about=20 "bombing Afghanistan back to <BR>> > >the Stone Age." Ronn = Owens, on=20 KGO Talk Radio allowed that this <BR>> > >would mean killing = innocent=20 people, people who had nothing to do <BR>> > >with this = atrocity, but=20 "we're at war, we have to accept collateral <BR>> > >damage," = and he=20 asked, "What else can we do? What is your <BR>> > = >suggestion?" =20 Minutes later I heard a TV pundit discussing whether <BR>> > = >we "have=20 the belly to do what must be done."<BR>> > ><BR>> > = >And I=20 thought about these issues especially hard because I am from <BR>> = >=20 >Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never = <BR>> > >lost track of what's been going on over there. So I = want to=20 share a <BR>> > >few thoughts with anyone who will = listen.<BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > >I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin = Laden.=20 There is <BR>> > >no doubt in my mind that these people were=20 responsible for the <BR>> > >atrocity in New York. I fervently = wish to=20 see those monsters <BR>> > >punished.<BR>> > ><BR>> = >=20 >But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not = even=20 <BR>> > >the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a = cult of=20 ignorant <BR>> > >psychotics who captured Afghanistan in 1997 = and have=20 been holding <BR>> > >the country in bondage ever since. Bin = Laden is a=20 political criminal <BR>> > >with a master plan. When you = think=20 Taliban, think Nazis. When you <BR>> > >think Bin Laden, think = Hitler.=20 And when you think "the people of <BR>> > >Afghanistan" think = "the Jews=20 in the concentration camps." It's not <BR>> > >only = that=20 the Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity. <BR>> > = >They=20 were the first victims of the perpetrators. They would love for <BR>> = >=20 >someone to eliminate the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of = <BR>>=20 > >international thugs holed up in their country. I guarantee = it.<BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > >Some say, if that's the case, why don't the = Afghans=20 rise up and <BR>> > >overthrow the Taliban themselves? The = answer is,=20 they're starved, <BR>> > >exhausted, damaged, and = incapacitated. =20 A few years ago, the United <BR>> > >Nations estimated that = there are=20 500,000 disabled orphans in <BR>> > >Afghanistan--a country = with no=20 economy, no food. Millions of <BR>> > >Afghans are widows = of the=20 approximately two million men killed <BR>> > >during the war = with the=20 Soviets. And the Taliban has been executing <BR>> > = >these women=20 for being women and have buried some of their opponents <BR>> > = >alive=20 in mass graves. The soil of Afghanistan is littered with land = <BR>>=20 > >mines and almost all the farms have been destroyed . The Afghan = <BR>> > >people have tried to overthrow the Taliban. They = haven't been=20 able <BR>> > >to.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >We come = now to the=20 question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone <BR>> > >Age. = Trouble=20 with that scheme is, it's already been done. The <BR>> > = >Soviets took=20 care of it . Make the Afghans suffer? They're already <BR>> = >=20 >suffering. Level their houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles = <BR>>=20 > >of rubble? Done. Eradicate their hospitals? Done. = Destroy=20 their <BR>> > >infrastructure? There is no = infrastructure. =20 Cut them off from <BR>> > >medicine and health care? Too = late.=20 Someone already did all that.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >New = bombs would=20 only land in the rubble of earlier bombs. Would <BR>> > = >they at=20 least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, <BR>> > = >only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around. = <BR>> >=20 >They'd slip away and hide. (They have already, I hear.) Maybe = >=20 <BR>> > >the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, = they don't=20 move <BR>> > >too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But = flying=20 over Kabul <BR>> > >and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a = strike=20 against the criminals <BR>> > >who did this horrific thing. = Actually it=20 would be making common <BR>> > >cause with the Taliban--by = raping once=20 again the people they've been <BR>> > >raping all this = time<BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > >So what else can be done, then? Let me now = speak with=20 true fear and <BR>> > >trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden = is to=20 go in there with <BR>> > >ground troops. I think that when = people speak=20 of "having the belly <BR>> > >to do what needs to be done" many = of them=20 are thinking in terms of <BR>> > >having the belly to kill as = many as=20 needed. They are thinking about <BR>> > >overcoming moral = qualms=20 about killing innocent people. But it's the <BR>> > >belly to = die not=20 kill that's actually on the table. Americans will <BR>> > = >die in=20 a land war to get Bin Laden. And not just because some <BR>> = >=20 >Americans would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin = <BR>>=20 > >Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than that, folks. To = get any=20 <BR>> > >troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through = Pakistan. Would=20 they <BR>> > >let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan = would have=20 to be first. <BR>> > >Will other Muslim nations just stand by? = You see=20 where I'm going. <BR>> > >The invasion approach is a flirtation = with=20 global war between Islam <BR>> > >and the West.<BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > >And that is Bin Laden's program. That's exactly = what he=20 wants and <BR>> > >why he did this thing. Read his = speeches and=20 statements. It's all <BR>> > >right there. AT the moment, = of=20 course, "Islam" as such does not <BR>> > >exist. There are = Muslims and=20 there are Muslim countries, but no such <BR>> > >political = entity as=20 Islam. Bin Laden believes that if he can get a <BR>> > = >war=20 started, he can constitute this entity and he'd be running it. <BR>> = >=20 >He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem <BR>> = >=20 >ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam = <BR>>=20 > >and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the West = wreaks a=20 <BR>> > >holocaust in Muslim lands, that's a billion people = with=20 nothing left <BR>> > >to lose, even better from Bin Laden's = point of=20 view. He's probably <BR>> > >wrong about winning, in the = end the=20 west would probably <BR>> > >overcome--whatever that would mean = in such=20 a war; but the war would <BR>> > >last for years and millions = would=20 die, not just theirs but ours. Who <BR>> > >has the belly for = that? Bin=20 Laden yes, but anyone else?<BR>> > ><BR>> > >I don't = have a=20 solution. But I do believe that suffering and poverty <BR>> > = >are the=20 soil in which terrorism grows. Bin Laden and his cohorts <BR>> > = >want=20 to bait us into creating more such soil, so they and their kind <BR>> = >=20 >can flourish. We can't let him do that. That's my humble = opinion.<BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > >Tamim Ansary<BR>> <BR>>=20 <BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C14044.62A7C340-- Received on Tue 18 Sep 2001 01:18:20 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |