[meteorite-list] Re: Jeff's Response with regard to type 7

From: Jeff Grossman <jgrossman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:47:11 2004
Message-ID: <>

Sahara 97037 also sounds like a good candidate for type 7, but it too has=20
received no study other than the initial characterization (that I know=20
about). Until this changes, it goes in the same category as Dhofar 011:=20
call it a 7 but check back after somebody does a systematic study.

I've never heard that Forrest 007 is anything but an H4.


At 04:01 AM 11/16/2001, Joseph Murakami wrote:
>Hello to all,
>I'll throw in a mention for Forest 007 LL7 as eval'd by Dr. Keil. Thanks
>----- Original Message -----
>From: LABENNE METEORITES <metlabo1_at_worldnet.fr>
>To: Jeff Grossman <jgrossman_at_usgs.gov>;
>Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:54 AM
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Re: Jeff's Response with regard to type 7
>Hello Jeff & list!
>Don't forget the SAH97037. Abstract from the Meteoritical Bulletin, N=B0=
>Show your support at the Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund -=20
>Meteorite-list mailing list

Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184
US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383
954 National Center
Reston, VA 20192, USA
Received on Fri 16 Nov 2001 07:47:05 AM PST

Help support this free mailing list:

Yahoo MyWeb